2014
DOI: 10.12816/0007858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Techniques for Management of Common Bile Duct Stones : A Single Centre Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the inclusion criteria for CBDs varied across the trials, possibly leading to bias to this meta-analysis; meanwhile, the most common size was $10 mm, and it is different from the commonly clinical endoscopy practice (>15 mm), and we could not proceed with further analysis based on the size of stones because of the lack of more detailed data. Second, the maximum balloon diameter used in the included trials varied, the maximum balloon diameter used in Guo et al19 and El Wakil et al17 trials was 15 mm while maximum balloon diameter was 20 mm in the other trials; however, we were not sure whether the results would be affected by this difference. Third, only three of the included trials reported the use of post-endoscopy biliary drainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, the inclusion criteria for CBDs varied across the trials, possibly leading to bias to this meta-analysis; meanwhile, the most common size was $10 mm, and it is different from the commonly clinical endoscopy practice (>15 mm), and we could not proceed with further analysis based on the size of stones because of the lack of more detailed data. Second, the maximum balloon diameter used in the included trials varied, the maximum balloon diameter used in Guo et al19 and El Wakil et al17 trials was 15 mm while maximum balloon diameter was 20 mm in the other trials; however, we were not sure whether the results would be affected by this difference. Third, only three of the included trials reported the use of post-endoscopy biliary drainage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In terms of the use of ML, six studies13,16,17,1921 provided data for this outcome with low heterogeneity ( I 2 =14%, P =0.32). The rate was lower in the EST with EPLBD group (36/330, 10.9%) than in the EPLBD alone group (42/338, 12.4%); however, the combined result was not statistically significant (OR =1.18, 95% CI=0.68–2.05, P =0.55) (Table 3, Figure 2B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations