2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The landslides inventory map displays 240 historical disaster points, with loss data from each disaster provided by the China Geological Survey [34]. These points are the centroid of landslide scarp, which has been proved the best landslide sampling strategy [36], and they were derived from latitude and longitude vectoring combining remote sensing imagery and field surveys. We extracted 45 topple points, 155 slide points, and 40 debris flow points from the landslides inventory and classified each hazard into 5 risk levels according to the loss.…”
Section: Landslides Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landslides inventory map displays 240 historical disaster points, with loss data from each disaster provided by the China Geological Survey [34]. These points are the centroid of landslide scarp, which has been proved the best landslide sampling strategy [36], and they were derived from latitude and longitude vectoring combining remote sensing imagery and field surveys. We extracted 45 topple points, 155 slide points, and 40 debris flow points from the landslides inventory and classified each hazard into 5 risk levels according to the loss.…”
Section: Landslides Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One strategy for reducing loss of life and damage from landslides is to prepare maps that identify areas vulnerable to landslides [12,13]. Landslide susceptibility may be defined as the likelihood that a landslide will occur in a given area or at a specific site [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypotheses or constraints are not necessary when optimizing NNs [111][112][113], and they are also able to analyze and explore complex (even nonlinear) relationships in data [114][115][116]. From a computational point of view, NNs are powerful at solving high dimensional problems because of their processing capabilities in parallel [19,117,118]. Based on the various advantages mentioned previously, the NN model has been employed in the past for predicting the failures of structural elements [32][33][34][35][36][119][120][121][122].…”
Section: Neural Network (Nn)mentioning
confidence: 99%