Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.2111/rem-d-13-00080.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Root and Shoot Responses to Mowing and Fertility in Native and Invaded Grassland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…in Montana, USA, root length and mass showed no response to grazing or nutrient addition. In contrast, above-ground mass decreased and increased, respectively, as expected (Balogianni et al 2014). This decoupling of above-and below-ground responses has also been noted in tundra , and may partly explain why grassland invaders are hard to control using common management methods.…”
Section: Invasionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…in Montana, USA, root length and mass showed no response to grazing or nutrient addition. In contrast, above-ground mass decreased and increased, respectively, as expected (Balogianni et al 2014). This decoupling of above-and below-ground responses has also been noted in tundra , and may partly explain why grassland invaders are hard to control using common management methods.…”
Section: Invasionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In addition, some studies have reported that fertilization increases root biomass (Tewari and Joshi, 1985;Rajaniemi et al, 2003;Tomaškin et al, 2013); nevertheless, low dose fertilization increases root biomass and high doses cause a decrease (Holub et al, 2013). The data of the current study differed from other researchers (Pucheta et al, 2004;Glab and Kacorzyk, 2011;Ladwig et al, 2012;Balogianni et al, 2014), due to different environmental conditions and management applications (Nippert et al, 2012;Yan et al, 2013), different amounts of fertilizer (Holub et al, 2013) and different grazing intensity and ungrazing applications (McNaughton et al, 1998).…”
Section: Root Biomasscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Roots not only fix plants to soil, but also an important cycling interface of water and nutrients in terrestrial ecosystems, and relationships of root traits with soil water and nutrients can well reflect the specific adaptation and species ability to survive and settle in harsh environments (e.g., saline lands and deserts). In general, the availability of water and soil nutrients to plants in an ecosystem, where annual evaporation demand exceeds precipitation, depends on local climate, edaphic factors and on the depth, lateral spread and degree of overlap of plant root systems (Balogianni, Wilson, Vaness, MacDougall, & Pinno, 2014; Casper & Jackson, 1997; Henry, Cal, Batoto, Torres, & Serraj, 2012; Nadelhoffer & Raich, 1992; Schenk & Jackson, 2002; Schulze et al, 1996). Shallow root systems are the attributes of some desert plants, but desert and temperate coniferous forests have the deepest rooting profiles of terrestrial biomes (Canadell et al, 1996; Hasse et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and degree of overlap of plant root systems (Balogianni, Wilson, Vaness, MacDougall, & Pinno, 2014;Casper & Jackson, 1997;Henry, Cal, Batoto, Torres, & Serraj, 2012;Nadelhoffer & Raich, 1992;Schenk & Jackson, 2002;Schulze et al, 1996). Shallow root systems are the attributes of some desert plants, but desert and temperate coniferous forests have the deepest rooting profiles of terrestrial biomes (Canadell et al, 1996;Hasse et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%