2007
DOI: 10.1080/08860220601038884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Risk Factors and Causes for Early Death after Initiating Dialysis in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of these studies are shown in Table . Studies originating in North America accounted for the majority of observations (12 studies, population: 831559), while the remaining observations originated in Europe (10 studies, population: 93 815 patients), Asia (four studies, combined population of 46 421 patients), Australia‐New Zealand (one study; population: 23 658), Africa (three studies, population: population of 530 patients), and South America (one study, 395 participants). There was also one multinational study , involving developed countries with 86 886 participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The characteristics of these studies are shown in Table . Studies originating in North America accounted for the majority of observations (12 studies, population: 831559), while the remaining observations originated in Europe (10 studies, population: 93 815 patients), Asia (four studies, combined population of 46 421 patients), Australia‐New Zealand (one study; population: 23 658), Africa (three studies, population: population of 530 patients), and South America (one study, 395 participants). There was also one multinational study , involving developed countries with 86 886 participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The summary of quality assessment of studies is presented in Appendix S1. Overall, 13 studies (combined population 967 282) , were judged to be at low risk of bias (high quality) and 19 (combined population 115 982) at high risk of bias (low quality). The main contributory factor for being assessed at high risk of bias included reliance on registry data where the completion of entries in the registry where uncertain , restricting participation to selected groups such as the elderly and diabetic subjects , studies with high probability of acute cases being included in the cohort , eligibility criteria of study participants or the source population unclear , method of outcome ascertainment not fully described , exclusion of eligible patients , and possible selective reporting of outcomes with high numbers of censoring events other than all‐cause mortality .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations