2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different ribotypes in community-acquired Clostridium difficile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalent ribotypes in this Kuwait study is different from those reported in other studies in Asia [11,40e42], North America [6], and Europe [41,43]. In Europe, ribotypes 078, 014 and 172 are the most commonly found types in CA-CDI in the Netherlands [44], ribotypes 001 and 027 in UK [45], and ribotype 078 in Scotland [5].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The prevalent ribotypes in this Kuwait study is different from those reported in other studies in Asia [11,40e42], North America [6], and Europe [41,43]. In Europe, ribotypes 078, 014 and 172 are the most commonly found types in CA-CDI in the Netherlands [44], ribotypes 001 and 027 in UK [45], and ribotype 078 in Scotland [5].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The ribotypes most prevalent in Singapore are different from those reported in other studies in Asia [20][21][22], North America and Europe [20,23]. In studies in Europe, ribotypes 078, 014 and 172 were most commonly found in CO-CDI cases in The Netherlands [24], whilst ribotypes 001 and 027 were most common in the UK [25].…”
contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The emergence of the binary toxin-positive strain PCR ribotype 078 can be observed worldwide [10,29,30,23] in both the community and various animals [31][32][33][34][35][36]. Data on the comparative genomics of C. difficile suggest that human strains have arisen from those found in pigs [24], which leads to the possibility that zoonotic transmission is responsible for the rise of community-associated C. difficile infections [1,20,35].…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of C. difficile infection in Austria in 2006-2007 revealed a case fatality ratio of 8.45% [5]. Although most cases of C. difficile occur in a hospital setting, community onset and community-associated infections are apparently increasing [30,[43][44][45][46][47][48]. In a recent study of the etiology of acute gastroenteritis in three sentinel general practices in Austria, toxigenic C. difficile ranked only second to norovirus as an etiologic agent of acute gastroenteritis [49].…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%