2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different responses of invasive and native species to elevated CO2 concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it can be hypothesized that invasive exotic plants will have a greater positive response to elevated CO 2 conditions than their native counterparts, resulting in an increase in their competitive ability relative to slower growing species. Open top chamber (Dukes 2002;Hattenschwiler and Korner 2003), controlled environment glasshouse (Smith et al 1987), environmental controlled growth chamber (Sasek and Strain 1991;Ziska 2003; Baruch and Jackson 2005;Ziska et al 2005;McPeek and Wang 2007;Song et al 2009), and FACE (Smith et al 2000;Huxman and Smith 2001;Belote et al 2003;Nagel et al 2004) experiments that have manipulated CO 2 levels have provided evidence to support this hypothesis (but see Taylor and Potvin 1997;Dukes 2000;Bradford et al 2007 for exceptions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, it can be hypothesized that invasive exotic plants will have a greater positive response to elevated CO 2 conditions than their native counterparts, resulting in an increase in their competitive ability relative to slower growing species. Open top chamber (Dukes 2002;Hattenschwiler and Korner 2003), controlled environment glasshouse (Smith et al 1987), environmental controlled growth chamber (Sasek and Strain 1991;Ziska 2003; Baruch and Jackson 2005;Ziska et al 2005;McPeek and Wang 2007;Song et al 2009), and FACE (Smith et al 2000;Huxman and Smith 2001;Belote et al 2003;Nagel et al 2004) experiments that have manipulated CO 2 levels have provided evidence to support this hypothesis (but see Taylor and Potvin 1997;Dukes 2000;Bradford et al 2007 for exceptions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, Spartina alterniflora was found to have a competitive advantage over native plant species ). Other studies illustrated significant differences in the response of native and invasive plants (Mikania micrantha, Wedelia trilobata, Ipomoea cairica) to elevated concentrations of CO 2 and discussed these results in terms of a future success of invasive species in the face of ongoing increases in atmospheric CO 2 concentrations (Song et al 2009, Song et al 2010. found that increased temperatures enhance the aboveground biomass in Ipomoea cairica as well as the phytotoxicity of aqueous leachates from fresh leaves of this introduced liana.…”
Section: Underlying Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Song et al (2009) found that the increase in photosynthetic rate due to elevated CO 2 concentrations was significantly higher in non-native than in native species. In a study on the Yangtze River system, Jiang et al Studies on the genetic variation or diversity of non-native plants revealed a very low genetic diversity in most clonal invasive plants such as Alternanthera philoxeroides and Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.)…”
Section: Biological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast-growing species require higher capture of nutrients and have a stronger carbon drain, and therefore respond more intensively to an increase in [CO 2 ] (Poorter 1993;Poorter & Navas 2003). The increase in [CO 2 ] is likely to promote the dominance of invasive species (Smith et al 2000;Polley et al 2002;Weltzin et al 2003), which can be stimulated to increase growth and leaf area as well as biomass of leaves, stems and roots (Ziska & George 2004;Song et al 2009). Several authors have postulated that climate change will have imbalanced effects among native and invasive plants .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics, associated with a high phenotypic variability, may enhance the ability of B. dracunculifolia to behave as an invasive species (Negreiros et al 2014). The great plasticity shown by invasive species allow them to adjust the allocation of biomass (Song et al 2009) or maximize the production of seeds, favoring the colonization of habitats after disturbances (Chew & Bonser 2009). In a future scenario of changes in resource availability by increased [CO 2 ], species with large plastic capacity may have greater success in establishment, by changing physiological or morphological traits to maintain the balance of resource acquisition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%