2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.205309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different regimes of Förster-type energy transfer between an epitaxial quantum well and a proximal monolayer of semiconductor nanocrystals

Abstract: We calculate the rate of non-radiative, Förster-type energy transfer (ET) from an excited epitaxial quantum well (QW) to a proximal monolayer of semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots (QDs).Different electron-hole configurations in the QW are considered as a function of temperature and excited electron-hole density. A comparison of the theoretically determined ET rate and QW radiative recombination rate shows that, depending on the specific conditions, the ET rate is comparable to or even greater than the radi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consideration should also be given to the transition from localized to free excitons and/or from excitons to more loosely bound electron-hole pairs. For example, in their theoretical treatment of energy transfer in an InGaN QW/colloidal quantum dot system, Kos et al showed that localization of QW excitons tends to decrease the FRET efficiency at lower temperatures, mirroring the saturation behavior seen in curve C. [13] Time-resolved measurements, together with theoretical modeling, will be needed in order to gain a deeper insight into these factors. This is the topic of ongoing work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consideration should also be given to the transition from localized to free excitons and/or from excitons to more loosely bound electron-hole pairs. For example, in their theoretical treatment of energy transfer in an InGaN QW/colloidal quantum dot system, Kos et al showed that localization of QW excitons tends to decrease the FRET efficiency at lower temperatures, mirroring the saturation behavior seen in curve C. [13] Time-resolved measurements, together with theoretical modeling, will be needed in order to gain a deeper insight into these factors. This is the topic of ongoing work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1,2 Recently, dye-sensitization of inorganic semiconductors has gained interest, and ET has enabled the design of hybrid nanostructures involving several kinds of organic and inorganic components with the role of energy donor and acceptor for optoelectronic and/or photovoltaic applications. [7][8][9][10][11] Hybrid nanostructured systems based on ET combine nanostructured materials with a large absorption cross section in the visible part of the solar spectrum with high mobility semiconductor layers. ET, enabled by a near-field electromagnetic interaction, generates an electron-hole pair in the semiconductor layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For donor QW free carriers the energy transfer rate is proportional to the carrier density, whereas it is independent of carrier density for donor QW excitons. A linear dependence of the direct nonradiative energy transfer rate from an InGaN QW to a monolayer of CdSe QDs has been experimentally reported and found to be in good agreement with a theoretical model for free carrier QW excitations [35]. The QW PL quenching by the Ag nanobox array is also considered to arise due to nonradiative energy transfer to the metal nanoparticle acceptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Both increase with increasing carrier density. As previously reported the carrier density dependence of the Förster nonradiative energy transfer rate from a QW is determined by whether the electronic excitations in the QW are free electrons and holes or bound electron hole pairs (excitons) [4,35]. For donor QW free carriers the energy transfer rate is proportional to the carrier density, whereas it is independent of carrier density for donor QW excitons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation