2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different preparations, doses, and treatment regimens of cyclosporine A cause adverse effects but no robust changes in seizure thresholds in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present data show that the lower efficacies of AMPAR antagonists to the PP2B-ERK1/2-SGK1-NEDD4-2-mediated GRIA1 ubiquitination and the inhibition of spontaneous seizure activities (presumably due to the higher clearance of AMPAR antagonists or the lower affinities of AMPAR antagonists on GRIA1 [23][24][25]) in non-responders were improved by CsA co-treatment. If the upregulated GRIA2-lacking AMPAR expression resulted in refractory seizures to AMPAR antagonists, CsA co-treatment would not inhibit seizure activity in non-responders, since a lack of effects of CsA on neuronal excitability and seizure activity is well known [30,58,59]. Therefore, our findings suggest that the upregulated GRIA2-lacking AMPAR expression in non-responders may not be a primary cause of intractable seizures to AMPAR antagonists (although it may be relevant to ictogenesis), but may be a consequence of the irresponsiveness to AMPAR antagonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the present data show that the lower efficacies of AMPAR antagonists to the PP2B-ERK1/2-SGK1-NEDD4-2-mediated GRIA1 ubiquitination and the inhibition of spontaneous seizure activities (presumably due to the higher clearance of AMPAR antagonists or the lower affinities of AMPAR antagonists on GRIA1 [23][24][25]) in non-responders were improved by CsA co-treatment. If the upregulated GRIA2-lacking AMPAR expression resulted in refractory seizures to AMPAR antagonists, CsA co-treatment would not inhibit seizure activity in non-responders, since a lack of effects of CsA on neuronal excitability and seizure activity is well known [30,58,59]. Therefore, our findings suggest that the upregulated GRIA2-lacking AMPAR expression in non-responders may not be a primary cause of intractable seizures to AMPAR antagonists (although it may be relevant to ictogenesis), but may be a consequence of the irresponsiveness to AMPAR antagonists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amygdala‐kindling model is highly predictive for detecting clinically effective drugs for the treatment of focal onset seizures as in temporal lobe epilepsies 21 and is thus considered a model for difficult‐to‐treat types of seizures. We previously published kindling protocols comparable to the one used here, 22,35,38,39 which is described in detail in the Supplement. Briefly, rats were electrically kindled via a chronically implanted electrode in the right amygdala.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the ivPTZ‐ST test is particularly sensitive to drugs that increase GABAergic inhibition, 20 such as GABA‐AT inactivators, and can be used to determine the ability of drugs to alter seizure thresholds by applying the drug at the appropriate time before onset of PTZ infusion. To avoid a kindling effect, the number of ivPTZ‐ST tests was limited to a maximum of five in the same individual, which has been proven not to change seizure thresholds 34,35 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%