2018
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2018.1561702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different practice effects for males and females by psychometric and chronometric mental-rotation tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the improvement over time at all angles did not differ by side, which leads us to the assumption, that the same mental transformation processes are used on both sides. This is also supported by the lower reaction times of participants with previous experience with the two-figure layout, although learning effects are not fully understood (Heil, Rösler, Link, & Bajric, 1998;Rahe, Ruthsatz, Jansen, & Quaiser-Pohl, 2019;Uttal et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Additionally, the improvement over time at all angles did not differ by side, which leads us to the assumption, that the same mental transformation processes are used on both sides. This is also supported by the lower reaction times of participants with previous experience with the two-figure layout, although learning effects are not fully understood (Heil, Rösler, Link, & Bajric, 1998;Rahe, Ruthsatz, Jansen, & Quaiser-Pohl, 2019;Uttal et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it is clear that time constraint is one critical factor in MR tasks that will usually amplify the size of the sex/gender difference. Notably, chronometric MR tests, which measure reaction time when identifying whether an object is a rotated or mirrored version of another without a time limit, do not tend to show sex/gender differences (Rahe et al 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, previous research showed that, in general, female students benefited more than male students from practicing with feedback, resulting in more gains in spatial ability development (Narciss et al, 2014). Moreover, the reaction time of females improved after receiving feedback, as it seemed to make them feel more confident about their skills and answers (Rahe et al, 2019). Therefore, practicing with feedback might translate into a motivational strategy that reduces the gender gap by improving women's performance in spatial tasks (Kass et al, 1998).…”
Section: Addressing Gender Differences Through Spatial Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%