Different patterns and drivers of fungal communities between phyllosphere and rhizosphere in alpine grasslands

Abstract

Epiphytic fungi are vital in enhancing their host plant performance and can also cause plant diseases. Generally, phyllosphere fungal community are majorly driven by climate, while rhizosphere fungal community are determined by soil properties and spatial distance. However, the differences in the relative effects of environmental factors on fungal community compositions and network structures remain far from clear between phyllosphere and rhizosphere. In this study, we conducted a large‐scale field survey along a 1400 km transect in the Tibetan Plateau and explored the composition and structure of phyllosphere and rhizosphere fungal communities from two dominant grass species (Leontopodium nanum and Stipa purpurea). L. nanum is widely distributed in relatively wet areas of alpine grasslands but S. purpurea prefers relatively dry areas. The geographical distributions of these two species overlap in the middle of the transect First, we found that precipitation was more important than temperature to affect fungal alpha diversity. High precipitation significantly promoted fungal alpha diversity in both phyllosphere and rhizosphere. Second, climate and spatial variables explained more variations in fungal community in the phyllosphere than rhizosphere. Specifically, greater precipitation promoted the relative abundances of pathotrophic fungi in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere, whereas lower precipitation only stimulated the relative abundances of symbiotrophic fungi in the rhizosphere. Third, precipitation had different impacts on phyllosphere and rhizosphere fungal networks between host species. Drought caused lower node number of fungal networks in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of L. nanum. However, for S. purpurea, drought led to more complex and positive fungal networks in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere. Overall, these results indicated that precipitation caused different fungal community compositions along the transect between phyllosphere and rhizosphere, but consistently shaped their fungal networks. This study is among the first to provide compelling evidence on the large‐scale spatial variations and controlling factors for epiphytic fungal community in alpine grasslands. These new findings help to understand the role of epiphytic fungal community in affecting the functions of alpine grasses to cope with extreme environments. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Fungal community characteristics of the last remaining habitat of three paphiopedilum species in China

“…On the other hand, there are differences in the growth environments of different Paphiopedilum species. In particular, the environmental heterogeneity caused by geographical distribution is a direct environmental factor affecting the composition of fungal communities in habitats [56,57]. To adapt to the environment, fungi adopt different nutritional methods, which is a survival strategy adopted by fungi to adapt to different living conditions [58,59].…”

Aridity threshold for alpine soil nitrogen isotope signature and ecosystem nitrogen cycling

“…One subsample was air‐dried to determine the soil 15 N abundance and soil properties; the second subsample was stored at 4°C for analyzing the inorganic N (NH 4 + and NO 3 − ) concentrations, N transformation rates, and microbial biomass; the third subsample was stored at −80°C for measuring soil bacteria, fungi and denitrifying gene abundances. We also sampled the two dominant grass species, Leontopodium nanum , and Stipa purpurea , to determine foliar δ 15 N. These two species were selected based on their vast distribution along the aridity gradient (Li et al., 2023).…”

Facilitation and competition deconstructed: a mechanistic modelling approach to the stress gradient hypothesis applied to drylands

“…The Stress Gradient Hypothesis (SGH) 13 is an influential hypothesis that originated in ecology as an experimental conjecture and has evolved into a valuable tool, also used in restoration studies 23,[31][32][33] . Additionally, the SGH has been increasingly applied to other living systems 34 , such as microbial and microbiome systems where it has garnered experimental and modeling support [35][36][37][38][39] , despite some divergent findings 40 . Particularly, the SGH has been fundamental in promoting discussion and inspiring research about the relationship between plant We modelled the dynamics of a nurse plant and a protégé plant which compete for two resources, soil water and light, with the protégé plant grazed by herbivores.…”