Different partial volume correction methods lead to different conclusions: An 18F-FDG-PET study of aging

Abstract

A cross-sectional group study of the effects of aging on brain metabolism as measured with 18F-FDG PET was performed using several different partial volume correction (PVC) methods: no correction (NoPVC), Meltzer (MZ), Müller-Gärtner (MG), and the symmetric geometric transfer matrix (SGTM) using 99 subjects aged 65-87 from the Harvard Aging Brain study. Sensitivity to parameter selection was tested for MZ and MG. The various methods and parameter settings resulted in an extremely wide range of conclusions as to the effects of age on metabolism, from almost no changes to virtually all of cortical regions showing a decrease with age. Simulations showed that NoPVC had significant bias that made the age effect on metabolism appear to be much larger and more significant than it is. MZ was found to be the same as NoPVC for liberal brain masks; for conservative brain masks, MZ showed few areas correlated with age. MG and SGTM were found to be similar; however, MG was sensitive to a thresholding parameter that can result in data loss. CSF uptake was surprisingly high at about 15% of that in gray matter. Exclusion of CSF from SGTM and MG models, which is almost universally done, caused a substantial loss in the power to detect age-related changes. This diversity of results reflects the literature on the metabolism of aging and suggests that extreme care should be taken when applying PVC or interpreting results that have been corrected for partial volume effects. Using the SGTM, significant age-related changes of about 7% per decade were found in frontal and cingulate cortices as well as primary visual and insular cortices.

A High-ResolutionIn VivoAtlas of the Human Brain's Serotonin System

“…Nevertheless, we still see subtle signs suggestive of partial volume effects; for example, bands of lower binding along the medial wall ( Figure 6). Although a partial-volume-corrected atlas could be generated, we chose not to do so because methods for partial volume corrections come with their own set of limitations (Harri et al, 2007) and can lead to different results depending on the algorithm used (Greve et al, 2016).…”

“…Regional TACs for the cortical regions were extracted by resampling the TACs to the cortical surface (Greve and Fischl, 2009) and taking the average within each of the 34 regions defined by the Desikan-Killiany Greve et al (2016). In addition, a segmentation of cerebellum including different lobules (e.g., vermis) were created using SUIT 2.7 (Diedrichsen, 2006) and SPM12 ͑http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm͒.…”

18F-Flortaucipir Binding in Choroid Plexus: Related to Race and Hippocampus Signal

“…PiB DVR was used as a continuous measure of Aβ, and a Gaussian mixture modeling approach following previously described methods [25] was used to classify the participants as Aβ+ or Aβ− (cutoff value, 1.186). Data with and without partial volume correction (pvc) using the geometric transfer matrix method were used for analyses [26]. …”

Fluorodeoxyglucose metabolism associated with tau‐amyloid interaction predicts memory decline

“…FTP and FDG were expressed as standard uptake volume ratios (SUVR), PiB as the distribution volume ratio (DVR) using the Logan graphical method, with slopes extracted from the 40–60min timeframe. All PET data used cerebellum as reference region (gray matter only) and were corrected for partial volume effects using MRI-based methods (geometric transfer matrix 16, 17 for ROI and extended Müller-Gärtner 17, 18 for surface analyses). The point spread function for partial volume correction was estimated at 6mm.…”