2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8sm02355g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different metrics for connecting mobility and glassiness in thin films

Abstract: Alternative perspectives of mobility method 1 (blue) vs. method 2 (red) compared to experimental data (symbols).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, simulations are generally limited to relatively small timescales, so assumptions need to be made if one were to describe the truly glassy dynamics. There are currently multiple theories that capture the T g -reduction in free-standing thin filmsthe “Elastically Cooperative Nonlinear Langevin Equation” (ECNLE) of Schweizer and co-workers, , the combined “Locally Correlated Cluster” (LCL) – “Cooperative Free Volume” (CFV) approach of Lipson and White, the “slow-domain percolation” theory of Long and co-workers, the “string model” of Douglas and co-workers, and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, simulations are generally limited to relatively small timescales, so assumptions need to be made if one were to describe the truly glassy dynamics. There are currently multiple theories that capture the T g -reduction in free-standing thin filmsthe “Elastically Cooperative Nonlinear Langevin Equation” (ECNLE) of Schweizer and co-workers, , the combined “Locally Correlated Cluster” (LCL) – “Cooperative Free Volume” (CFV) approach of Lipson and White, the “slow-domain percolation” theory of Long and co-workers, the “string model” of Douglas and co-workers, and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%