2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268818001723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?

Abstract: In the absence of perfect reference standard, classical techniques result in biased diagnostic accuracy and prevalence estimates. By statistically defining the true disease status, latent class models (LCM) constitute a promising alternative. However, LCM is a complex method which relies on parametric assumptions, including usually a conditional independence between tests and might suffer from data sparseness. We carefully applied LCMs to assess new campylobacter infection detection tests for which bacteriolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…culture, only double-positive cases by two independent PCRs could be considered as true Campylobacter sp. positives in case of negative culture [2,8,9]. We did not find a perfect correlation between the Campylobacter PCR results obtained on BD MAX TM and the two independent PCR formats.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…culture, only double-positive cases by two independent PCRs could be considered as true Campylobacter sp. positives in case of negative culture [2,8,9]. We did not find a perfect correlation between the Campylobacter PCR results obtained on BD MAX TM and the two independent PCR formats.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…We did not perform the molecular method when culture was positive because of the excellent specificity with this latter method when MALDI-TOF gives a score up to 2 for the Campylobacter identified [ 14 ]. The diagnostic accuracy of the real-time PCR and the ELISA was previously assessed by Asselineau et al In their study, a latent class model confirmed that these CIDTs were valid to evaluate a test in the absence of a correct gold standard [ 16 ]. Furthermore, despite the fact that the real-time PCR and ELISA chosen are not perfect gold standards, they are based on two different principles and are known to be reliable and reproducible to detect C. jejuni and C. coli in stool samples [ 8 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These are complex methods that rely on the assumption of conditional independence between diagnostic tests and have the potential to correctly estimate the diagnostic accuracy of these molecular tests. These methods define the true target condition status as two latent classes and estimate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests based on these latent classes [51][52][53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%