2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10490-014-9384-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different identifications cause different types of voice: A role identity approach to the relations between organizational socialization and voice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discriminant validity was evaluated by using AMOS 22.0 software. According to the nested confirmatory factor analytic models by Wu et al, 52 we established and compared six nested models based on the research model ( Fig. 1) and ensured whether the six factors were distinct from each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminant validity was evaluated by using AMOS 22.0 software. According to the nested confirmatory factor analytic models by Wu et al, 52 we established and compared six nested models based on the research model ( Fig. 1) and ensured whether the six factors were distinct from each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the discriminant validity of constructs, we established six nested confirmatory factor analytic models based on the research model and compared their fits to the data [36]. Model 1 was a six-factor model treating each of the variables as separate factors; model 2 was a five-factor model treating performance expectancy and effort expectancy as the first factor, treating social influence as the second factor, treating attitude toward using technology as the third factor, treating behavioral intention as the fourth factor, and treating usage behavior as the fifth factor; model 3 was a four-factor model treating performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence as the first factor, treating attitude toward using technology as the second factor, treating behavioral intention as the third factor, and treating usage behavior as the fourth factor; model 4 was a three-factor model treating performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and attitude toward using technology as the first factor, treating behavioral intention as the second factor, and treating usage behavior as the third factor; model 5 was a two-factor model treating performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, attitude toward using technology, and behavioral intention as the first factor, and treating usage behavior as the second factor; and model 6 was a one-factor model treating all six factors as one factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the sub-theme of employee representation, employee voice behavior is depicted as being influenced by organizational socialization (Wu, Tang, Dong, & Liu, 2015), with associated grievance management systems also influenced by the history and ownership form of the firm, and contributing to productivity and enhanced relationships (Cooke & Saini, 2015). More nascent theorizing on conflict avoidance demonstrates that employees with high closure needs demonstrate greater tendency towards conflict avoidance (Zhang, Wei, Chao, & Zheng, 2017).…”
Section: Ethics Management and Contextual Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%