2017
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx247
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Genomic Changes Underlie Adaptive Evolution in Populations of Contrasting History

Abstract: Experimental evolution is a powerful tool to understand the adaptive potential of populations under environmental change. Here, we study the importance of the historical genetic background in the outcome of evolution at the genome-wide level. Using the natural clinal variation of Drosophila subobscura, we sampled populations from two contrasting latitudes (Adraga, Portugal and Groningen, Netherlands) and introduced them in a new common environment in the laboratory. We characterized the genome-wide temporal ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar differences in repeatability at genetic and phenotypic levels has been documented in a variety of systems (Blount et al ., 2018). Beyond this, some of this variation in repeatability of adaptation to lentil at the genetic level likely stems from differences in shared genetic variation available for selection across these cases (as has also been seen in evolve-and-resequence studies in Drosophila ; Seabra et al ., 2017). Because lentil is a very stressful host, each C. maculatus line went through a severe bottleneck when it was shifted onto lentil (Gompert & Messina, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar differences in repeatability at genetic and phenotypic levels has been documented in a variety of systems (Blount et al ., 2018). Beyond this, some of this variation in repeatability of adaptation to lentil at the genetic level likely stems from differences in shared genetic variation available for selection across these cases (as has also been seen in evolve-and-resequence studies in Drosophila ; Seabra et al ., 2017). Because lentil is a very stressful host, each C. maculatus line went through a severe bottleneck when it was shifted onto lentil (Gompert & Messina, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Gilligan and Frankham 2003;Rose et al 2004;Simões et al 2007, see below). The expectation of a deceleration of laboratory evolutionary trajectories in sexual organisms is sometimes justified in terms of temporal exhaustion of additive genetic variance, although genomic scans in experimentally evolved Drosophila populations have found only limited evidence of fixed alleles following selection (Burke et al 2010;Burke and Long 2012;Orozco-Terwengel et al 2012;Long et al 2015;Phillips et al 2016;Seabra et al 2018). In a previous study by our team, we found evidence for a deceleration in the evolutionary trajectory of fecundity in populations of Drosophila subobscura evolving for more than 80 generations in the lab environment (Simões et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…At the time of analysis, assembled genomic resources were not available for the obscura and subobscura subgroups, and our analysis of transcriptomic data did not identify duplications in those genes. Following submission, draft genome assemblies became available for D. obscura [39] and D. subobscura [40]. A search of these genomes confirmed that duplicates are undetectable for all genes except vreteno, but that two copies of vreteno are only detectable in D. obscura (not shown).…”
Section: Six Pirna Pathway Genes Are Duplicated and Asterix And Cutomentioning
confidence: 99%