2020
DOI: 10.1111/tan.13897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different eplet software programs give discordant and incorrect results: An analysis of HLAMatchmaker vs Fusion Matchmaker Eplet calling software

Abstract: HLA eplet matching is a novel approach to define acceptable HLA mismatches for transplant recipients. We performed an eplet analysis of three different transplant case‐series to determine if the available software programs gave accurate results. Eplet analysis was performed for three different transplant case‐series typed by NGS for all HLA class I and II loci. The three different HLA datasets were entered into both the HLAMatchmaker program (v2.1) and OLI Fusion MatchMaker (v4.2) software tools. Eplet results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the compilation of a detailed and accurate list of eplets as well as their calling by software programs are key components for all molecular mismatch scores and the assignment of the immunogenicity of individual eplets 25 . As shown by Kramer et al as well as Tambur et al, the current eplet lists need further refinements and verification 18,21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the compilation of a detailed and accurate list of eplets as well as their calling by software programs are key components for all molecular mismatch scores and the assignment of the immunogenicity of individual eplets 25 . As shown by Kramer et al as well as Tambur et al, the current eplet lists need further refinements and verification 18,21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curiously, eplet 55R was not identified by HLAMatchmaker analysis, while this eplet is present in the HLA Epitope Registry. This issue of inaccuracy in eplet software has been previously addressed by Tassone et al (51). As observed in the SAB data, 55R was also the uniquely shared residue for mAb LB_DQB0601_B, but this mAb demonstrated increased binding strength for eplet 55R with residue 53Q as additional configuration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Accordingly, the use of different definitions for the same eplet and the inclusion of eplet pairs in immunogenicity studies distorts the interpretation and comparability of immunogenicity scores. Furthermore, inconsistencies in eplet definition and antibody-verified status between the HLA Epitope Registry and HLAMatchmaker (60) and the lack of documentation of previous versions of the Registry hamper investigations towards eplet mismatch loads and transplant outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%