1987
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(87)90533-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different distribution of two types of angiotensin II-generating enzymes in the aortic wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
6

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
65
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, if the failure of captopril to block the pressor response to SUB indicates that Ang I-convertase can produce pressor amounts of Ang II from SUB, we would expect the convertase to produce some Ang II from Ang I in the presence of captopril. It may be that exogenously administered Ang I has easier access to ACE than to convertase, an hypothesis compatible with the findings of Okunishi et al 6 suggesting a primarily adventitial location for convertase versus an endothelial location for ACE; on the other hand, the present study suggests that captopril remains highly effective in endothelium-denuded vessels, indicating that ACE is not confined to the endothelium. This question may be resolved by measurements of both plasma and tissue Ang II after administration of intravenous SUB as well as by the advent of an effective in vivo chymase inhibitor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In other words, if the failure of captopril to block the pressor response to SUB indicates that Ang I-convertase can produce pressor amounts of Ang II from SUB, we would expect the convertase to produce some Ang II from Ang I in the presence of captopril. It may be that exogenously administered Ang I has easier access to ACE than to convertase, an hypothesis compatible with the findings of Okunishi et al 6 suggesting a primarily adventitial location for convertase versus an endothelial location for ACE; on the other hand, the present study suggests that captopril remains highly effective in endothelium-denuded vessels, indicating that ACE is not confined to the endothelium. This question may be resolved by measurements of both plasma and tissue Ang II after administration of intravenous SUB as well as by the advent of an effective in vivo chymase inhibitor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We have found that in vascular tissues in rats and rabbits, Ang I is converted to Ang II by ACE alone, while in humans, monkeys, dogs, and hamsters, Ang I is possibly converted by both ACE and chymase. [14][15][16] These species-dependent pathways of vascular Ang II production strongly suggest the involvement of Ang II produced by chymase, and may be the cause of the apparent discrepant action of ACE inhibitors in the rat and human studies. Ang II-producing ability in human blood vessels is approximately 70% dependent on chymase, and only 30% dependent on ACE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…formation in many tissues suggests the presence of noninhibitable converting enzyme activity (Okunishi et al, 1987) or other forms of angiotensin I convertase such as chymase (Urata et al, 1990). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%