2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different developmental trajectories for anticipation and receipt of reward during adolescence

Abstract: Typical adolescent behaviour such as increased risk-taking and novelty-seeking is probably related to developmental changes in the brain reward system. This functional MRI study investigated how brain activation related to two components of reward processing (Reward Anticipation and Reward Outcome) changes with age in a sample of 39 children, adolescents and young adults aged 10-25. Our data revealed age-related changes in brain activity during both components of reward processing. Activation related to Reward… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
64
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
9
64
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a study of 10-25-year olds (n ¼ 39) modeled linear and quadratic age effects across subjects as opposed to using age groups. They found a positive linear relationship between age and ventral striatal activation to anticipation of reward and, in contrast to the present report, the quadratic term did not significantly contribute beyond the linear term (Hoogendam et al, 2013). It is possible that the more thorough interrogation of the developmental continuum reported on here-with a broader age range (8-27), larger sample (n ¼ 175), and repeated measures (473 sessions)-is necessary to reveal the inverted U-shaped trajectory of activation to reward anticipation during the MID.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In contrast, a study of 10-25-year olds (n ¼ 39) modeled linear and quadratic age effects across subjects as opposed to using age groups. They found a positive linear relationship between age and ventral striatal activation to anticipation of reward and, in contrast to the present report, the quadratic term did not significantly contribute beyond the linear term (Hoogendam et al, 2013). It is possible that the more thorough interrogation of the developmental continuum reported on here-with a broader age range (8-27), larger sample (n ¼ 175), and repeated measures (473 sessions)-is necessary to reveal the inverted U-shaped trajectory of activation to reward anticipation during the MID.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In the manner of previous fMRI studies investigating cognitive functioning, 18,32,36,45 region of interest (ROI) analyses were performed to test for group differences in 5 predefined regions that are known for their involvement in reward processing, including the bilateral ventral striatum, dorsal striatum, insula, SMA, and orbitofrontal cortices (also referred to as ventromedial prefrontal cortex) (figure 2). 22,36,38 Regions were created using the automated anatomical labeling-atlas. 46 For each ROI, the average level of brain activation (ie, percent signal change) was obtained for each subject.…”
Section: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants performed a reward task [35][36][37] (figure 1) based on the monetary incentive delay task. 22 This task allows the investigation of anticipation and receipt of reward, separately.…”
Section: Monetary Incentive Delay Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deficits in frontostriatal development may become apparent already during adolescence, when the striatum is fully maturing, and the frontal cortex is developing (Casey et al, 2008;Hoogendam et al, 2013;Vink et al, 2014a, b). Offspring of schizophrenia patients may be best suited to investigate the impact of genetic vulnerability on adolescent brain development, as they inherit on average half their DNA from their ill parent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%