2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-019-01347-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different Degrees of Niche Differentiation for Bacteria, Fungi, and Myxomycetes Within an Elevational Transect in the German Alps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the large range of the study gradient, the differences in microbial community composition were not due to the geographical distance between sites per see, but rather due to the edaphic and floristic (previously reported, Weigel et al, 2019 and Table 1) differences between them. Furthermore, a similar environmental response between bacteria/archaea and fungi was observed (correlation in community similarities), which is in line with the well-known strong link between plants and microbes, especially in systems dominated by symbiotic relationships as ours (Bahram et al, 2015;Berg et al, 2016) and their interlinked dependence on nutrient availability ( Čapek et al, 2018) as also indicated from the clear association between vegetation variance and the availability of especially NH 4 -N. Thus, in line with our first hypothesis, our results support prior observations, that the plant community composition is among the main drivers for bacterial/archaeal and fungal soil community assembly in a temperate (alpine) forest gradient (Borg Dahl et al, 2019). Likewise, Choma et al (2020) found a strong and rapid change in the bacterial community composition in a beech forest as a result of an experimental change in pH of ca.…”
Section: Strong Interlinkage Between Microbiome Vegetation and Soil P...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite the large range of the study gradient, the differences in microbial community composition were not due to the geographical distance between sites per see, but rather due to the edaphic and floristic (previously reported, Weigel et al, 2019 and Table 1) differences between them. Furthermore, a similar environmental response between bacteria/archaea and fungi was observed (correlation in community similarities), which is in line with the well-known strong link between plants and microbes, especially in systems dominated by symbiotic relationships as ours (Bahram et al, 2015;Berg et al, 2016) and their interlinked dependence on nutrient availability ( Čapek et al, 2018) as also indicated from the clear association between vegetation variance and the availability of especially NH 4 -N. Thus, in line with our first hypothesis, our results support prior observations, that the plant community composition is among the main drivers for bacterial/archaeal and fungal soil community assembly in a temperate (alpine) forest gradient (Borg Dahl et al, 2019). Likewise, Choma et al (2020) found a strong and rapid change in the bacterial community composition in a beech forest as a result of an experimental change in pH of ca.…”
Section: Strong Interlinkage Between Microbiome Vegetation and Soil P...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The study we performed is a record for Ukraine for the amount of collected material (Romanenko, 2002;Leontyev, 2006a), thus allowing us to confirm the patterns earlier found in other regions of the world and detect some earlier undetermined peculiarities of the substrate ecology of myxomycetes. Similarly to the previous studies (Borg Dahl et al, 2019;Shchepin et al, 2019), abundance and diversity of corticulous myxomy-cetes were found to be the highest on the commonest species of substrateforming plants. However, we have shown that differences between the consortia in abundance of myxomycetes cannot be explained only by the number of collected samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…To determine the composition of prokaryotic and fungal communities, sequencing of 16S rRNA genes and ITS2 fragments (DNA) and transcripts (cDNA) was done as described previously [62]. Raw sequence reads are deposited on NCBI Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.…”
Section: Quantification and Sequencing Of Marker Genes For Prokaryotementioning
confidence: 99%