Canonical models suggest that mechanisms of long-term memory consist of a synapse-specific, protein synthesis-independent induction phase (changes in synaptic weights/temporary tagging of such synapses) and, within adjacent dendritic compartments, a protein synthesis-dependent distribution phase that may accompany or immediately precede induction and whose protein products enable consolidation through synaptic capture. We now report that this distribution phase is competitive in a "winner-take-all" fashion when synapses potentiated at induction compete with each other for plasticity-related proteins. This finding highlights the importance of synaptic competition in creating stable long-lasting memory in neural networks without disruption.A ctivity-dependent increases and decreases in synaptic efficacy, such as the physiological phenomena of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression, are considered to be prominent cellular mechanisms mediating learning and memory. Long-lasting persistence of synaptic strength requires protein synthesis that is achieved through transcription and translation (late LTP; L-LTP), whereas short-lasting changes do not involve protein synthesis (early LTP; E-LTP) (1). Based on this dependency on protein synthesis, a sequential model of memory has long been proposed involving the transition from E-LTP to L-LTP, and it remains an important framework for memory consolidation (2, 3). However, the newer concept of synaptic tagging and capture (STC) has changed our understanding of the necessity for a sequential framework. Instead, although memory encoding and tagging occur in real time in association with the event or stimulus to be remembered, the persistence of this trace depends also upon the capture of plasticity-related proteins (PRPs) whose synthesis can be triggered before, during, or immediately after memory encoding. The synthesis of PRPs, now thought to occur in relatively clustered dendritic domains (4, 5), creates the possibility for both synergistic (6) and competitive interactions between potential memories during the subsequent distribution phase. Synergistic effects are well-studied. However, although synaptic competition has been considered previously (7), the temporal dynamics of such competition are not well-understood. We now show that when the temporal persistence of synaptic potentiation is enabled on one pathway by virtue of the availability of PRPs from another earlier or later event, potentiation of a third pathway around the same time may trigger sufficient competition to prevent persistent potentiation on all pathways. Varying the timing of the potentiation of this third pathway enabled one or more pathways to persist whereas others do not. Thus, when the number of competing potential memories increases and the availability of PRPs is limited, a "winner-take-all" scenario appears to prevail whereby some traces persist in a stable manner whereas others do not. The use of multiple pathways models the likely situation in real life when the encoding of multi...