2011
DOI: 10.1136/ip.2010.029652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different approaches to obtaining consent for follow-up result in biased samples

Abstract: Caution is needed when interpreting results from studies using hospital samples, especially when wording of consent for follow-up requires direct affirmation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, it may be that children who participated in the study were, on average, slightly above average in terms of school-based achievement and developmental outcomes. Indeed, differences in parental consent have been identified as a major source of bias in sampling children (Pless, Hagel, Zhang, & Magdalinos, 2011). Nonetheless, such bias appears modest and sufficient variably exists to result in meaningful analysis.…”
Section: Results Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it may be that children who participated in the study were, on average, slightly above average in terms of school-based achievement and developmental outcomes. Indeed, differences in parental consent have been identified as a major source of bias in sampling children (Pless, Hagel, Zhang, & Magdalinos, 2011). Nonetheless, such bias appears modest and sufficient variably exists to result in meaningful analysis.…”
Section: Results Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] 12 Comparison of models [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] 15 Consent aspects of secondary uses of data 48,49 2 Development of a new model of consent/form [50][51][52][53][54] 5 Development of tools to assist consent process 55,56 2 Discussion of a single model [57][58][59][60] 4 Establishing and/or improving participant understanding 4,61-68 9 Other [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]…”
Section: Number Of Manuscriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%