The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different approaches to analyzing e-government adoption during the Covid-19 pandemic

Esther Garcia-Rio,
Pedro R. Palos-Sanchez,
Pedro Baena-Luna
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the most part, they have implemented electronic government or e-government services and are guided by a supply-demand idea that citizens and other constituencies need 24/7 service availability [8,9]. Many PAs at different levels (local, regional) are increasingly finding that the supply of their electronic services exceeds their planned demand and that it is difficult to assess the impact of e-government systems [10]. Despite supporting citizens during COVID-19, what persists is that most digital or e-government services offered by PAs has been focused on information provision and transacting to the potential detriment of others, for example, business education, mentoring or support [5,10].…”
Section: Public Administrations (Pas) and Relational Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the most part, they have implemented electronic government or e-government services and are guided by a supply-demand idea that citizens and other constituencies need 24/7 service availability [8,9]. Many PAs at different levels (local, regional) are increasingly finding that the supply of their electronic services exceeds their planned demand and that it is difficult to assess the impact of e-government systems [10]. Despite supporting citizens during COVID-19, what persists is that most digital or e-government services offered by PAs has been focused on information provision and transacting to the potential detriment of others, for example, business education, mentoring or support [5,10].…”
Section: Public Administrations (Pas) and Relational Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many PAs at different levels (local, regional) are increasingly finding that the supply of their electronic services exceeds their planned demand and that it is difficult to assess the impact of e-government systems [10]. Despite supporting citizens during COVID-19, what persists is that most digital or e-government services offered by PAs has been focused on information provision and transacting to the potential detriment of others, for example, business education, mentoring or support [5,10]. What is more, PAs are not advancing to alternative models of e-government that could foster better empowerment and governance, as initially proposed by early research in this area [11].…”
Section: Public Administrations (Pas) and Relational Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of e-government (Shareef et al, 2014;Voican, 2023), unlike e-democracy, this was characterised because although it provided citizens with different resources and e-services (Garcia-Rio et al, 2023), it kept the decision-making capacity in the hands of the government authority and did not involve the participation of the citizens.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garcia-Rio et al surveyed theoretical models based on UMEGA, including the role of Spanish e-government in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (Garcia-Rio et al 2023). According to the results, Performance Expectancy was the most crucial factor for users when considering e-public services, followed by Social Influence, Role of e-Government during the health crisis, and Perceived Trust.…”
Section: Customer Satisfaction With Digital Public Services and Its M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The related work summarized in the previous subsection draws on factors derived from seminal works in the field of TAM and UTAUT from Davis (Davis 1989) and Venkatesh et al (Venkatesh et al 2003) respectively. The majority of these studies have utilized Partial Least Squares (PLS) SEM, while four models have been built using service evaluation approaches (Papadomichelaki and Mentzas 2012;Mensah et al 2020;Nugroho et al 2022;Garcia-Rio et al 2023). One study relied on SEM and ML techniques (classification) (AlHadid et al 2022).…”
Section: Comparison Of Existing Models Of Customer Satisfaction With ...mentioning
confidence: 99%