1987
DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730710410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different approaches for teaching volume and students' visualization ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Joram et al., (1998) maintained that fourth grade students can mentally manipulate images and predicted that such cognitive development would improve estimation. Gabel and Enochs (1987) examined visual‐spatial ability to determine how best to teach metrics (length, area, or volume first). They showed that for high visual‐spatial ability students teaching length, area and volume in sequence was successful, but that a volume first approach was more effective for low visual‐spatial ability students.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joram et al., (1998) maintained that fourth grade students can mentally manipulate images and predicted that such cognitive development would improve estimation. Gabel and Enochs (1987) examined visual‐spatial ability to determine how best to teach metrics (length, area, or volume first). They showed that for high visual‐spatial ability students teaching length, area and volume in sequence was successful, but that a volume first approach was more effective for low visual‐spatial ability students.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of volume was selected as the topic for the mini‐unit, because it incorporates both mathematics and science concepts equally and is considered, along with mass, weight, and density as central to the physical sciences (Klopfer, Champagne, & Chaiklin, 1992). The concept is often difficult for students to understand (Enochs & Gabel, 1984; Gabel & Enochs, 1987; Potari & Spiliotopoulou, 1996). The lessons will cover both the NSES (1996) and NCTM (2000) standards.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%