2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6215(00)00070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Different action patterns for apple pectin methylesterase at pH 7.0 and 4.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
92
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The charge density was also very homogeneous. This is in agreement with the mechanism generally accepted for Aspergillus species PMEs (26,59). The modification of the pectin by PME was also confirmed by its higher susceptibility to chain cleavage by endo-PG (data no shown).…”
Section: Pectin Extraction From the Fiber: Effect Of Autoclaving Timesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The charge density was also very homogeneous. This is in agreement with the mechanism generally accepted for Aspergillus species PMEs (26,59). The modification of the pectin by PME was also confirmed by its higher susceptibility to chain cleavage by endo-PG (data no shown).…”
Section: Pectin Extraction From the Fiber: Effect Of Autoclaving Timesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As discussed by Jolie et al (2010), the pH, the DM, and the pattern of methylesterification are known to modify the mode of action of PMEs (Catoire et al, 1998;Denès et al, 2000;Sénéchal et al, 2014). Thus, we can also hypothesize that, upon random action of the PME (PME48 or others from the 13 other pollen-specific PMEs), the partial removal of methylester groups may allow other pectin-degrading enzymes such as PGases and/or PLs to cleave the HG, affecting the rigidity of the cell wall (Micheli, 2001;Sénéchal et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the action of fungal PMEs (fPMEs) is generally regarded as random (or multiple chain mechanism), resulting in the de-esterification of single GalA residues per enzyme/substrate interaction (23)(24)(25). However, the precise nature of the action patterns of fPME and pPME are far from clear, and some pPMEs appear to have the capacity to remove a limited number of methyl esters per reaction, giving rise to short un-esterified blocks (20). Moreover, recently developed procedures for the enzymatic fingerprinting of pectic fragments have indicated that the action patterns of fPMEs are non-blockwise, but probably not in fact random (24).…”
Section: Or Repeats Of the Disaccharide (34)-␣-d-gala-(132)-␣-l-rha-(mentioning
confidence: 99%