Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Software and Data Technologies 2007
DOI: 10.5220/0001342900900099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DIFFERENCING AND MERGING OF SOFTWARE DIAGRAMS - State of the Art and Challenges

Abstract: Abstract:For long, fine-grained version control for software documents has been neglected severely. Typically, software configuration management systems support the management of text or binary files. Unfortunately, text-based tools for fine-grained version control are not adequate for software documents produced in earlier phases in the software life cycle. Frequently, these documents have a graphical syntax; therefore we will call them software diagrams. This paper discusses the current state of the art in f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) that was carried out in order to present the state-of-the-art of model matching approaches. This survey is different from others [9,30,57,134,146] as few other studies focus on the categorization of model matching, and even fewer use a systematic approach, or focus on text-based model matching algorithms. We further elaborate on the differences between this survey and others in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) that was carried out in order to present the state-of-the-art of model matching approaches. This survey is different from others [9,30,57,134,146] as few other studies focus on the categorization of model matching, and even fewer use a systematic approach, or focus on text-based model matching algorithms. We further elaborate on the differences between this survey and others in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%