Differences of skin morphology in Bos indicus, Bos taurus, and their crossbreds

Abstract

Cutaneous evaporation is the main avenue by which cattle dissipate heat via the involvement of sweat glands and other skin components. The difference in skin morphology between B. indicus and B. taurus has been recognized, as well as differences in their ability to tolerate heat. The objective of this study was to compare skin morphology between B. indicus, B. taurus, and their crossbreds. Skin samples of Sahiwal (B. indicus) (n=10, reddish brown skin) and Holstein Friesian (HF) (B. taurus) (n=10, black and white skin) and crossbred of HF75% (n=10, black and white skin) and HF87.5 % (n=10, black and white skin) were biopsied for histological study, followed by measurement of skin components. The results indicated that breed significantly affected sweat gland morphology. The shape of the sweat gland, as indicated by the ratio of length/diameter, in Sahiwal was baggier in shape compared to HF (5.99 and 9.52) while values for crossbreds were intermediate (7.82, 8.45). The density and volume of sweat glands in Sahiwal (1,058 glands/cm(2); 1.60 μ(3) × 10(-6)) were higher than in HF (920 glands/cm(2); 0.51 μ(3)x10(-6)) and crossbreds, both HF 75 % (709 glands/cm(2); 0.68 μ(3) × 10(-6)) and HF 87.5 % (691 glands/cm(2); 0.61 μ(3) × 10(-6)) respectively. However, capillary surface area was greater for HF (2.07 cm(2)) compared to Sahiwal (1.79 cm(2)); accordingly, the lower genetic fraction of HF in crossbred cattle showed less capillary surface area (1.83 and 1.9 cm(2) for HF75% and HF87.5 %) (P<0.01). Nerve density was not significantly different between Sahiwal and HF but was higher in the crossbred (P<0.01) cattle. Moreover, the effect of skin color (black and white) was evaluated and it was found that there was an interaction (P<0.01) between breed and skin color on the skin components. This study reveals that there are differences in skin morphology among B. indicus, B. taurus and their crossbreds, with these differences being more or less related to the genetic fraction of HF. This may imply that capability for cutaneous evaporative heat loss and tolerance to heat in crossbred cattle could be related to skin morphology.

Whole genome detection of signature of positive selection in African cattle reveals selection for thermotolerance

“…Thermal sweating is one of the mechanisms of heat tolerance (Jian et al 2014;Lenis Sanin et al 2016). Thermoregulatory sweating in cattle involves numerous apocrine sweat glands (Akers & Denbow 2008).…”

“…Mammalian skin and hair provide physical protection and thermoregulation functions (Jian et al 2014). Some properties of the hair coat and coat color in cattle that enhance conductive and convective heat loss and reduce absorption of solar radiation can be taken as phenotypic markers of heat tolerance (Finch et al 1984;Hansen 2004;Lenis Sanin et al 2016).…”

Improving effects of dietary rumen protected γ‐aminobutyric acid additive on apparent nutrient digestibility, growth performance and health status in heat‐stressed beef cattle

“…are warm-blooded animals but cannot withstand high heat stress. Cutaneous evaporation is the main avenue by which cattle dissipate heat via the involvement of sweat glands and other skin components(Jian, Duangjinda, Vajrabukka, & Katawatin, 2014). In tropical and temperate climates such as in southern China, cattle are prone to suffer with heat stress during summer months.…”

Evaluation of Scrotal Temperature in Different Testicular Shapes by Infrared Thermography in Braford Bulls

“…When compared to bulls of different breeds, B. taurus indicus have an increased number of sweat glands in the skin of the scrotum of different sizes and shapes and a longer testicular artery relative to the size of the testicle, causing them to lose heat more easily through sweating [5]. This condition allows them to be more tolerant to high temperatures compared to B. taurus cattle [10]. These traits allow for better heat dissipation and require less blood.…”