1993
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1070250110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences of size and shape of active and inactive X‐chromosome domains in human amniotic fluid cell nuclei

Abstract: It is a widely held belief that the inactive X-chromosome (Xi) in female cell nuclei is strongly condensed as compared to the largely decondensed active X-chromosome (Xa). We have reconsidered this problem and painted X-chromosome domains in nuclei of subconfluent, female and male human amniotic fluid cell cultures (46,XX and 46,XY) by chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization with biotinylated human X-chromosome specific library DNA. FITCconjugated avidin was used for probe detection and nuclei we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the gene rich CT 19 was reported to occupy a less compacted territory and have a more irregular shape than the gene poor CT 18 (Croft et al 1999). Similarly, the gene active CT Xa was found to have a more irregular and extended shape than its gene inactive CT Xi homolog (Bischoff et al 1993; Eils et al 1996; Walker et al 1991). Differences in CT shapes across the population, and a relative maintenance of these shapes for up to four hours in the cell cycle were further suggested from live cell analyses (Edelmann et al 2001; Muller et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, the gene rich CT 19 was reported to occupy a less compacted territory and have a more irregular shape than the gene poor CT 18 (Croft et al 1999). Similarly, the gene active CT Xa was found to have a more irregular and extended shape than its gene inactive CT Xi homolog (Bischoff et al 1993; Eils et al 1996; Walker et al 1991). Differences in CT shapes across the population, and a relative maintenance of these shapes for up to four hours in the cell cycle were further suggested from live cell analyses (Edelmann et al 2001; Muller et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, it affords a larger S-phase window for following the replication status of a given locus. Moreover, since interphase chromosomes are folded and are each organized in a specific nuclear territory (especially those of the inactive X-chromosome), proximal and distal chromosomal regions of each chromosome become relatively close to one another (Dyer et al 1989;Cremer et al 1993;Bischoff et al 1993). Thus, Xsat may also be used as a suitable marker for loci located distal to the centromere, e.g., FMR1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA FISH probes that paint chromosomes have generally been employed to estimate chromosomal volume and through application of this technique, multiple studies using RNA/DNA FISH to identify the Xist RNA-coated Xi, have reported that the volume occupied by the Xi is smaller than that of the Xa. Using the total nuclear volume as a normalizer, a standard ratio of between 1.25 +/− 0.05 is consistently reported [55,94,95]. However, to decisively conclude that the nuclear space occupied by the Xi is indeed smaller than that of Xa, the difference between the Xa and Xi should be compared to, and significantly differ from, that between homologous autosomes.…”
Section: Shape and Volume Distinguish The XI From The Xamentioning
confidence: 99%