2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Shedding Duration in Sputum and Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens Among Adult Inpatients With Coronavirus Disease 2019

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The viral shedding duration of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has not been fully defined. Consecutive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from respiratory tract specimens is essential for determining duration of virus shedding and providing evidence to optimize the clinical management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the shedding durations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the upper and lower respiratory tract specimens? What are their associated risk fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
69
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Duration of viral genetic shedding was shorter from nasopharyngeal swabs than sputum samples, at 19 and 34 days ( P < .001), respectively. 8 More prolonged RT-PCR detection of viral RNA in lower respiratory specimens has also been shown in other studies when compared with upper respiratory samples. 2 , 6 Wang et al suggest that this more-prolonged shedding in lower respiratory specimens compared with nasopharyngeal specimens may impact infection control policies if a “test based” clearance strategy is used for removing patients from COVID-19 isolation precautions.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Duration of viral genetic shedding was shorter from nasopharyngeal swabs than sputum samples, at 19 and 34 days ( P < .001), respectively. 8 More prolonged RT-PCR detection of viral RNA in lower respiratory specimens has also been shown in other studies when compared with upper respiratory samples. 2 , 6 Wang et al suggest that this more-prolonged shedding in lower respiratory specimens compared with nasopharyngeal specimens may impact infection control policies if a “test based” clearance strategy is used for removing patients from COVID-19 isolation precautions.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…2 , 5 Studies have shown increased sensitivity of lower respiratory tract specimens compared with upper respiratory tract specimens 2 , 6 , 7 ; however, it can be technically challenging and create additional safety and exposure concerns to obtain sputum or BAL samples, particularly in patients who are not intubated. In this issue of CHEST , Wang et al 8 also found that of 68 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, 20.6% had negative initial and follow-up nasopharyngeal swabs, but a positive sputum specimen, when tested for SARS CoV-2 by RT-PCR molecular assay. SARS CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR from respiratory specimens remains the primary diagnostic strategy for COVID-19 infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the current study, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in nose and throat swabs of all infected ferrets. In COVID-19 patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was also easily detected in upper respiratory tract (URT) specimens, however the detection rate of SARS-CoV RNA in URT specimens of SARS patients was low, with SARS-CoV RNA detection by RT-PCR in only 32% to 68% of the tested patients 13,17,31,32 . This lower detection rate, likely as a result of lower or no replication of SARS-CoV in the upper respiratory tract, may explain why SARS-CoV was less efficiently transmitted between humans than SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings of a recent study suggest the transmissivity of the novel coronavirus is significantly decreased among patients who retest positive after recovery from COVID-19 [3]. Several studies on IgG and IgM antibody responses in COVID-19 patients and SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding have been performed [4][5][6][7][8], but further information is crucial to better understand the epidemiological characteristics of this virus. In the present report, we describe a patient with mild clinical manifestations of COVID-19 who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 for 53 days based on RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab, as well as her husband who also tested positive for the virus but had a shorter positive period despite a more moderate presentation of symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%