2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences of marine and transitional shales in the case of dominant pore types and exploration strategies, in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main storage space of shale gas is the micro-/nano-pores, which mainly consist of organic pores, intergranular pores, and intragranular pores. The pore characteristics are closely related to the sedimentary environments. Organic pores formed by hydrocarbon generation are the main gas occurrence space for marine shale, which has been verified in many studies. However, organic pores in coal measure shale and terrestrial shale are poorly developed. Cao et al believed that compared with marine shale, coal measure shale has lower maturity and fewer organic pores, resulting in a negative correlation between the porosity and total organic carbon (TOC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The main storage space of shale gas is the micro-/nano-pores, which mainly consist of organic pores, intergranular pores, and intragranular pores. The pore characteristics are closely related to the sedimentary environments. Organic pores formed by hydrocarbon generation are the main gas occurrence space for marine shale, which has been verified in many studies. However, organic pores in coal measure shale and terrestrial shale are poorly developed. Cao et al believed that compared with marine shale, coal measure shale has lower maturity and fewer organic pores, resulting in a negative correlation between the porosity and total organic carbon (TOC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The division schemes of shale lithofacies were proposed based on TOC content and mineral composition in previous studies: 1) according to TOC content, shale was divided into 3 types and they are: organic-rich shale (TOC content:≥2%), organic-bearing shale (TOC content: 1-2%), and organic-lean shale (TOC content: 0-1%); 2) according to mineral composition, shale was divided into 4 types and they are: calcareous shale (carbonate minerals ≥50%), clayey shale (clay minerals ≥50%), siliceous shale (siliceous minerals ≥50%), mixed shale (siliceous minerals, clay minerals and carbonate minerals are all less than 50%) (Clarkson et al, 2013;Daigle et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2019a;Li et al, 2022b;Zhang et al, 2022c). In combination with the two division schemes, there appear 3×4=12 types of lithofacies.…”
Section: Lithofacies Division Of Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have also worked on comparing the nanopore properties of transitional and marine shales. Yang et al , investigated the morphology of organic-associated pores and nanoporosity for marine, transitional, and lacustrine shale from different basins in China. Their results revealed that marine shale is dominated by organic pores, while lacustrine and transitional shale give priority to clay-related pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al 30 compared the pore characteristics of marine and transitional shales from the lower Yangtze block and proposed that organic pores are poorly developed in both types of shale due to their low maturity. Li et al 26 conducted a comparative study on the nanopore characteristics of marine shale from the Sichuan Basin and transitional shale from the middle Yangtze Block. Their findings demonstrated that organic nanopores predominate in marine shale while mineral-hosted nanopores predominate in transitional shale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation