2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences of ICR cleanings in He, D2 and O2 for deposit removal and hydrogen release in HT-7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GDC using He and D 2 sequentially has been used to enhance hydrogen release and help obtain clean walls. Also, it has been observed that D 2 -GDC has a higher removal rate for hydrogen than He-GDC by a factor of about 3-possibly due to isotopic exchange [27], as shown in figure 2. Using these techniques a significant amount of hydrogen was seen to be removed, which proved to be essential before beginning the plasma operation.…”
Section: Surface Cleaning Using Gdcmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GDC using He and D 2 sequentially has been used to enhance hydrogen release and help obtain clean walls. Also, it has been observed that D 2 -GDC has a higher removal rate for hydrogen than He-GDC by a factor of about 3-possibly due to isotopic exchange [27], as shown in figure 2. Using these techniques a significant amount of hydrogen was seen to be removed, which proved to be essential before beginning the plasma operation.…”
Section: Surface Cleaning Using Gdcmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To attempt a reduction in the H/(H+D) ratio, D 2 -ICRF was also applied for surface cleaning. But it also exhibited little ability to remove hydrogen from hydrogen-rich PFMs [27]. Using the D 2 -ICRF technique, it was difficult to reduce the H/(H+D) ratio to below 20%.…”
Section: Surface Cleanings Using Icrf In Between Dischargesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECR discharge cleaning was compared with ICR discharge cleaning with regard to removal rate of hydrogen. ICR discharge cleaning has been campaigned on the HT-7 tokamak many times, and the results of D 2 ICR discharge cleaning in spring 2005 [18] were taken into comparison. The total pressure taken for both ECR and ICR discharge cleaning for D 2 was (1-10) × 10 −2 Pa, but the powers were rather different: for ECR, the power was 5 kW with continuous injections, while ICR cleaning used higher powers of 20 and 40 kW with pulsed injections.…”
Section: Comparison With Icr Discharge Cleaningmentioning
confidence: 99%