The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.7160/aol.2016.080109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences of Financial Management Strategy of Central European and Russian Milk Processors

Abstract: The aim of this article is a detailed investigation of financial performance of milk processing companies of Central Europe and the Russian Federation before the Russian embargo. An investigated object is a data base of accounting reports of 5 countries over the period of 2009 -2013. The number of selected companies is 370. The article also involves a short review of the dairy industry condition. In order to compare financial performance of two regions 4 types of criteria i.e. profitability ratios, turnover ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These initiatives are also supported by Špička and Kontsevaya (2016), who show that companies that generate higher profitability, in the case study of the dairy sector, have a more organized cost management, have greater advances in production technologies, among other factors, but also their capital structure is focused on long-term financing and shareholder investment. Therefore, in companies that are more financially strengthened, and leveraged by long-term financing, liquidity is not a problem, on the contrary, SMEs have working capital that allows financing technologies needed in their production processes and, in turn, favour the generation of economic returns on investment, increasingly significant; these statements are supported by Dungey, Doko and Yanotti, (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These initiatives are also supported by Špička and Kontsevaya (2016), who show that companies that generate higher profitability, in the case study of the dairy sector, have a more organized cost management, have greater advances in production technologies, among other factors, but also their capital structure is focused on long-term financing and shareholder investment. Therefore, in companies that are more financially strengthened, and leveraged by long-term financing, liquidity is not a problem, on the contrary, SMEs have working capital that allows financing technologies needed in their production processes and, in turn, favour the generation of economic returns on investment, increasingly significant; these statements are supported by Dungey, Doko and Yanotti, (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For the selection of the sample, obtaining the accounting figures and the analysis was taken as a basis, the research methodology applied by Špička and Kontsevaya (2016). Table 1 describes the size of the population and sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluating company A's financial sharing capabilities, five first-level indicators are divided into four dimensions, are allowed to score the financial sharing center capabilities [19]. e evaluation criteria are mainly reflected in key structures, such as sharing capabilities and data interaction speed.…”
Section: Evaluation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the livestock farming, unexpected events include diseases that may affect the production output. As regards the EU and its new member states, the Russian embargo of 2014 has also played a crucial role in shaping the milk market (Špička & Kontsevaya, 2016). In addition, the abandonment of the milk quotas (Čechura et al, 2021) led to even higher volatility of milk prices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%