2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-016-1801-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences of Bactericidal Efficacy on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis of Slightly and Strongly Acidic Electrolyzed Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lin, et al [40] revealed that the integrity and permeability of the E. coli cell membrane was disrupted by US treatment. SAEW (ACC = 25.27 mg/L) was reported to damage the cell membrane of E. coli , S. aureus , and B. subtilis [41] . US + SAEW treatment caused the release of cell contents and the disintegration of the cell wall and plasma membrane on S. aureus bacteria [42] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin, et al [40] revealed that the integrity and permeability of the E. coli cell membrane was disrupted by US treatment. SAEW (ACC = 25.27 mg/L) was reported to damage the cell membrane of E. coli , S. aureus , and B. subtilis [41] . US + SAEW treatment caused the release of cell contents and the disintegration of the cell wall and plasma membrane on S. aureus bacteria [42] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All test microorganisms were inactivated in a short time with the application of StAEW, as proved in the literature earlier. 10,30,31 On the other hand, nearly neutral SAEW has more application areas than the StAEW, since it does not cause the dangerous Cl 2 gas formation as well as corrosion of the processing equipment. 10 In this study, SAEW and MEW were produced through 45 s of electrolysis time to obtain moderate disinfection conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,30,31 On the other hand, nearly neutral SAEW has more application areas than the StAEW, since it does not cause the dangerous Cl 2 gas formation as well as corrosion of the processing equipment. 10 In this study, SAEW and MEW were produced through 45 s of electrolysis time to obtain moderate disinfection conditions. Although both EWs had similar pH and ORP values, the inactivation effects on test microorganisms were different according to the results of the microbiological test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SAEW is promoted widely in food preservation for its superiority in its broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, low cost of production, convenient application, and environment-friendly usage. Furthermore, related research has confirmed that SAEW can kill Listeria monocytogenes [15] , Escherichia coli [16] , Salmonella enterica [17] and other natural microbiota on the surface of food [16,18] .…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 89%