2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in water use efficiency among annual forages used by the dairy industry under optimum and deficit irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely due to the nearly constant values of K e resulting from the abundant and frequent rains that kept the soil evaporation layer wet most of time for all three cutting treatments. The standard K c values reported in Table 8 for this study with Tifton 85 bermudagrass are larger than those reported by Wherley et al [23] for bermudagrass and by Graham et al [48] for ryegrass, and slightly larger than those reported by Neal et al [24] for ryegrass. These authors also adopted a single averaged K c .…”
Section: Crop Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is likely due to the nearly constant values of K e resulting from the abundant and frequent rains that kept the soil evaporation layer wet most of time for all three cutting treatments. The standard K c values reported in Table 8 for this study with Tifton 85 bermudagrass are larger than those reported by Wherley et al [23] for bermudagrass and by Graham et al [48] for ryegrass, and slightly larger than those reported by Neal et al [24] for ryegrass. These authors also adopted a single averaged K c .…”
Section: Crop Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…A few authors directly compared ET obtained with eddy covariance, BREB, or a soil water balance with ET o but not searching for a K c value [20], or even assumed equality between grass ET and ET o [21]. Other authors just computed daily K c act values (often using different designations for that parameter) but did not search for a K c curve that would describe their seasonal variation [22,23], or just identified a mean seasonal K c act [24]. The lack of search for a K c curve led some authors to consider the K c -ET o approach as non-useful [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While WUE is an effective way to compare intrinsic physiological differences of a range of forages subjected to the same climatic conditions at a single location (Neal, Fulkerson, & Hacker, ), direct comparison with values from other studies is not always valid as values can be influenced by many factors including soil type and depth, nitrogen, temperature, solar radiation, VPD and management (e.g., Carter & Sheaffer, ; Hirth, Haines, Ridley, & Wilson, ; McCaskill et al., ; Neal, Fulkerson, & Hacker, ; Stout, ). Data from our study in part support our hypothesis that tropical grasses are more productive and have high WUE as digit grass had higher yield than the other forage types and so had higher WUE, but both Rhodes grass and forest bluegrass tended to have lower productivity and therefore lower WUE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sudanense is an annual summer plant (Almodares and Hadi 2009). Higher amounts of biomass can be obtained from this plant (Barbanti et al 2006) with low precipitation than other plants that are sources of sugar (Neal et al 2011). Keskin et al (2005) conducted a study in Turkey and found the dry grass efficiency of sorghum to be between 1.40 to 1.54 tons per decare (1 daa = 1000 square meters).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%