1985
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90670-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in twins: The importance of birth order

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings support the assumption that the multiples is not a significant risk factor for increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in VLBWI. Birth order of multiples has been considered as a prognostic factor because the second borns are at higher risk for malpresentation, hypoxia, and operative delivery (24)(25)(26). With the advent of modern perinatal care, however, most of the complications in the second born twins could be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings support the assumption that the multiples is not a significant risk factor for increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in VLBWI. Birth order of multiples has been considered as a prognostic factor because the second borns are at higher risk for malpresentation, hypoxia, and operative delivery (24)(25)(26). With the advent of modern perinatal care, however, most of the complications in the second born twins could be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second twin is more likely to have lower Apgar scores, less favorable umbilical arterial or venous parameters, a higher incidence of respiratory distress syndrome, a higher need for intubation, and a higher perinatal mortality [5][6][7]. Their disadvantage was attributed to differences in gender, birth weight, chorionicity, presentation, mode of delivery, time interval between births, birth trauma, instrumental delivery, and asphyxia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of very early experiences we consider the twins' birth order, as it is associated with APGAR scores at young ages (34). We control for birth order in all our regressions, but its inclusion among the regressors has a minor effect on our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%