1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1991.tb00337.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the Measurement of Wealth, Wealth Inequality and Wealth Composition Obtained From Alternative U.S. Wealth Surveys

Abstract: Since household wealth surveys have been widely used to study saving and other issues, it is important to examine the reliability of the various survey estimates of wealth. In this paper the authors assess the quality characteristics of the National Longitudinal Survey of Mature Men and the Retirement History Survey, as compared to the 1983 Survey of Consumer Finances. We find that the NLS and especially the RHS underreport wealth and wealth concentration. The underestimates of wealth held in the form of commo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the NLS-Y does not oversample wealthy households, it may underestimate wealth concentration (Juster and Kuester 1991;Juster, Smith, and Stafford 1999). However, my objective is to estimate longitudinal patterns (e.g., the effect of family background on adult outcomes) rather than cross-sectional levels of inequality, and the NLS-Y data are consistent longitudinally with estimates from similar surveys and other data sources (Keister and Moller 2000).…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Because the NLS-Y does not oversample wealthy households, it may underestimate wealth concentration (Juster and Kuester 1991;Juster, Smith, and Stafford 1999). However, my objective is to estimate longitudinal patterns (e.g., the effect of family background on adult outcomes) rather than cross-sectional levels of inequality, and the NLS-Y data are consistent longitudinally with estimates from similar surveys and other data sources (Keister and Moller 2000).…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 50%
“…9 SIPP data are not usually thought of as the best source of information for studying trends in wealth holdings in the United States. The Survey of Consumer Finance (SCF) inarguably provides a more comprehensive picture of the wealth distribution of American households than do alternative data sources -such as SIPP -which measure the upper tail of the wealth distribution particularly poorly (see Juster and Kuester, 1991;Juster, et al, 1999). Unfortunately, SCF data do not identify foreign-born individuals.…”
Section: The Survey Of Income and Program Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finance (SCF) inarguably provides a more comprehensive picture of the wealth distribution of American households than do alternative data sources -such as SIPP -which measure the upper tail of the wealth distribution particularly poorly (see Juster and Kuester, 1991;Wolff, 1998;Juster, et al, 1999). Unfortunately, SCF data do not identify immigrants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%