Differences in the Limits of Stability Between Older Rolling Walker Users and Older Single-Tip-Cane Users — A Preliminary Study

Abstract

Cane users might have better stability than walker users in the forward direction and in the direction toward the side holding the cane. This study may provide guide for clinicians including nurses for selecting appropriate rehabilitative interventions for older adults using walkers and canes.

Periodic Assessment of Walking Devices in Senior Living Communities

“…Such an association could result from both the impact of normal aging and the use of an AAD itself. As one ages, he or she may experience decline in cognition, visual acuity, sensitivity, alertness towards surrounding environment, endurance, and strength for daily activities [5][6][7]. On the other hand, when an individual ambulates with a walker or a cane, his or her body mechanics may change [8][9][10][11], which may cause balance, gait, and strength deficits.…”

“…It was reported that the majority of older adults selected an AAD on their own without medical professional consultation [5][6]. It was found that two older adults with similar physical conditions, but selected different walking devices (a cane or a walker) for ambulation, could actually develop different side effects from using an AAD, such as a deficit of functional stability [7]. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct periodic assessment of these AAD users before the side effects occur.…”

Physical Therapists’ Perceptions of Barriers to the Use of Evidence-based Fall Prevention Intervention with Individuals of 65 Years of Age or Older

“…Bateni and Maki (2005) reported that the use of assistive devices such as canes and walkers can contribute to increased gait quality and balance, these devices can also result in falls in certain situations and terrain were their use requires increased strength and high metabolic demands. The use of assistive devices, such as canes, crutches or walkers, can be beneficial to the older adults, but they can also represent potential fall risk (Liu, Quiben, Holmes, Connors & Salem, 2017).…”