“…However, our results are not as concordant as those expected with the larger study carried out in the Spanish population [13]. [11] c.1538_1541delAAGA Stop458 F 1 [11,13] c.1594_1595delGA Stop460 F 1 [11] c.1676_1677delAGinsTTAC Stop513 F 1 [11] c.1835insT a Stop542 F 2 [7,13] c. [6,11,[13][14][15] c.3492insT a Stop1098 F 5 [6,11,14] c.4075_4076delGT Stop1284 F 1 [11] c.4150G[T a p.E1308X N 3 [6,11,13,15] c.5025delT a Stop1616 F 3 [6,7] c.5164_5167delGAAA a Stop1668 F 1 [6,11,15] c.5340_5343delAATA Stop1710 F 1 [11] c.5514_5515delTC Stop1766 F 1 [11] c.5804_5807delTTAA Stop1862 F 2 [11,13,14] c.5946_5949delCTCT Stop1909 F 1 [11] c. For BRCA2, there is a coincidence of 11 mutations with other reports performed in the Spanish population [13][14][15]. The 2003 report of Diez et al [13] is concordant with our study in 10 out of the 22 different mutations (45%), c.1538_1541delAAGA, c.3036_3039delACAA, c.3492insT, c.4150G[T, c.5804_5807delTTAA, c.6503_6504delTT, c.6857_6858delAA, c.9206_9219del14, c.9246C[A, and c.9254_9258delATCAT, which represent 70% (37/53) of the families reported by that study [13] and 58% of the families (41/71) of this study.…”