1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980101)82:1<60::aid-cncr7>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by japanese and western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
136
1
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
136
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the perioperative complication rate compared favorably with that of the TEM series, and the rate of abdominal surgery controlling complications was negligible. Postoperative histology assessment demonstrated a much higher incidence of adenocarcinoma in the ESD series, which was attributable to a different way of classifying intramucosal lesions [37]. The rates of unpredicted invasive cancers treated in the two groups were comparable, but this required further surgery for oncologic reasons about four times more often in the ESD group due to the higher incidence of R1 resections than in the TEM group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Yet the perioperative complication rate compared favorably with that of the TEM series, and the rate of abdominal surgery controlling complications was negligible. Postoperative histology assessment demonstrated a much higher incidence of adenocarcinoma in the ESD series, which was attributable to a different way of classifying intramucosal lesions [37]. The rates of unpredicted invasive cancers treated in the two groups were comparable, but this required further surgery for oncologic reasons about four times more often in the ESD group due to the higher incidence of R1 resections than in the TEM group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…1 These discrepancies are caused by differences in the histological criteria applied to colorectal intramucosal tumors according to accepted Western or Japanese protocols. [1][2] The presence of submucosal invasion is the most important diagnostic criterion for most Western pathologists, whereas in Japan, nuclear features and glandular structures are more important to the diagnosis. 2 In fact, the actual degree of histological concordance between Western and Japanese pathologists is reported to be poor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2] The presence of submucosal invasion is the most important diagnostic criterion for most Western pathologists, whereas in Japan, nuclear features and glandular structures are more important to the diagnosis. 2 In fact, the actual degree of histological concordance between Western and Japanese pathologists is reported to be poor. 1, 2 Schlemper et al 2 indicated that the actual rate of concordance between Western and Japanese pathologists is less than 20% (3 of 20 cases).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan, colorectal carcinoma is diagnosed on the basis of nuclear and cellular patterns, even in cases considered by Western pathologists as non-invasive lesions with low-grade dysplasia. The Japanese approach promotes a higher rate of discovery of the early stages of colorectal carcinomas than in Western countries (13). These studies showed that de novo-appearing carcinomas have most, if not all, of the same molecular and structural defects generally found in colorectal carcinomas (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%