2002
DOI: 10.1310/wmwl-6w9y-pxv2-x148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the detection of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors in non-blood compartments: Clinical correlations

Abstract: Major differences exist between PIs in terms of detection in non-blood compartments. An undetectable PI level in CSF does not rule out drug activity in the brain for lopinavir/r, although this is not the case for nelfinavir. Poor penetration of PIs in semen in some patients can lead to double nucleoside therapy in this compartment. The persistence of HIV-1 RNA in LNs does not seem to be related to PI levels in this tissue.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible explanations for these discrepant findings are differences in the complexity and composition of antiretroviral regimens the study subjects received. Whereas many earlier studies had focused on resistance to zidovudine, a drug with reasonably good CSF penetration, many contemporary regimens include drugs with marginal CSF penetration, such as the protease inhibitors (3,28,50,52). Heterogeneity of drug concentrations has been predicted to promote the emergence of resistance (41) and may also explain the maintenance of populations of virus with differing resistance patterns in this and other recent studies (14,91).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Possible explanations for these discrepant findings are differences in the complexity and composition of antiretroviral regimens the study subjects received. Whereas many earlier studies had focused on resistance to zidovudine, a drug with reasonably good CSF penetration, many contemporary regimens include drugs with marginal CSF penetration, such as the protease inhibitors (3,28,50,52). Heterogeneity of drug concentrations has been predicted to promote the emergence of resistance (41) and may also explain the maintenance of populations of virus with differing resistance patterns in this and other recent studies (14,91).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In two cases (subjects 1115 and 1113) the reappearance of a variant with wild-type mobility and the viral load changes suggest that poor compliance might indeed account for the persistence of the wild-type pro sequences. Second, variants with high RTV susceptibility could be replicating in RTV-inaccessible compartments, such as the central nervous system (23,33,66). And third, the fitness loss associated with the evolution of resistance in the sequence background of these pro genes may have resulted in fitness levels that were similar to those of the wild type in the presence of RTV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of reverse transcriptase in culture supernatants was measured as described previously (6) with the following modifications. The radionucleotide incorporated into the nascent DNA strand was 33 P, a vacuum manifold (Bio-Rad) was used to capture the newly synthesized DNA on anionexchange paper, and storage phosphor autoradiography (Storm 840 PhosphorImager; Molecular Devices) was used to quantitate incorporated radioactivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite intraclass variability, ratios of ARV levels between seminal plasma and blood are typically lower for PIs than NRTIs or NNRTIs. [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] We could not, however, definitively evaluate the impact of ARVs on viral decay rate in seminal plasma because of infrequent sampling following ARV initiation.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%