2018
DOI: 10.17116/stomat20189737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in the cytocompatibility of bone-plastic materials from xenogeneic hydroxyapatite with stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells

Abstract: From the point of cytocompatibility all the examined bone-plastic materials may be considered safe for the restoration of bone defects. It should be noted that SHED transplantation on the surface of materials containing xenogeneic hydroxypatite is unacceptable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the MTT test, at 48 h, the BO group presented higher cytotoxicity than the others, although both biomaterials presented the same cytotoxicity at 72 h. Vasilyev et al (2018) also shows higher cytotoxicity in the presence of the biomaterial BO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…During the MTT test, at 48 h, the BO group presented higher cytotoxicity than the others, although both biomaterials presented the same cytotoxicity at 72 h. Vasilyev et al (2018) also shows higher cytotoxicity in the presence of the biomaterial BO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%