2013
DOI: 10.17955/tvr.113.1.729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Spoken Lexical Skills: Preschool Children with Cochlear Implants and Children with Typical Hearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sentences assessment. 4,5,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] With few exceptions, 54,55 deaf and hard of hearing children generally have smaller spoken English vocabularies than age-matched hearing peers. [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71] ASL exposure seems to be a more reliable means of developing age-expected vocabularies than interventions focused on spoken English.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sentences assessment. 4,5,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] With few exceptions, 54,55 deaf and hard of hearing children generally have smaller spoken English vocabularies than age-matched hearing peers. [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71] ASL exposure seems to be a more reliable means of developing age-expected vocabularies than interventions focused on spoken English.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research comparing CI users to children without hearing loss reveals a group difference in favour of the children with typical hearing (e.g., Schorr et al 2008; Geers et al 2009; Boons et al 2013; Lund 2016). A recent, small study by Luckhurst et al (2013) goes against this general trend. Luckhurst et al compared a small group of 9 profoundly deaf children with CIs, ages 3;7 to 6;5, to a group of 42 age-matched, hearing children who were similar for SES, ethnicity, and gender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In recent years, much of the research examining language and speech outcomes attained by children with hearing loss focused on the benefits of cochlear implantation (e.g., Tomblin et al 1999; Geers et al 2003; Nicholas & Geers 2007; Schorr et al 2008; Geers et al 2009; Hayes et al 2009; Inscoe et al 2009; Niparko et al 2010; Boons et al 2012; Boons et al 2013; Luckhurst et al 2013; Lund 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis evaluated 12 articles and also supported that children with CIs scored significantly lower than their hearing peers in both vocabulary tasks (Lund, 2016). On the contrary, other studies have reported that children with CIs did not perform significantly differently in receptive and expressive vocabulary tasks than their hearing peers (Luckhurst et al, 2013;Wechsler-Kashi et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%