2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in sphere-forming cells from keratoconic and normal corneal tissue: Implications for keratoconus pathogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of functional differences, KC-derived corneal fibroblasts deposit a thinner extracellular matrix with higher profibrotic collagen type III deposition and lower collagen type I compared to controls [ 91 , 92 ]. Stem cells derived from the corneoscleral rim likewise display decreased proliferative ability and elevated α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression in KC-derived spheroids [ 93 ]. Collectively, these in vitro findings have been consistent with the phenotype of moderate to severe KC in vivo [ 94 ], suggesting that the genetic or epigenetic features of KC are retained in early passages of primary corneal stromal cells.…”
Section: Corneamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of functional differences, KC-derived corneal fibroblasts deposit a thinner extracellular matrix with higher profibrotic collagen type III deposition and lower collagen type I compared to controls [ 91 , 92 ]. Stem cells derived from the corneoscleral rim likewise display decreased proliferative ability and elevated α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) expression in KC-derived spheroids [ 93 ]. Collectively, these in vitro findings have been consistent with the phenotype of moderate to severe KC in vivo [ 94 ], suggesting that the genetic or epigenetic features of KC are retained in early passages of primary corneal stromal cells.…”
Section: Corneamentioning
confidence: 99%