2018
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in soil moisture in two Middle Eastern oak forests: Comparing the effects of trees and soil composition

Abstract: The incidence of large rain events in Mediterranean ecosystems vary among years. Summer aridity is interpreted as a resetting event, eliminating previous soil‐moisture dynamics. The dynamics of soil moisture and retention are critical to tree survival, particularly in dry regions. This study examines the long‐term soil water content (θV) dynamics in two distinct locations within the forest, under the canopy and forest clearing, within two diverse oak forests: subhumid mixed oak forests (MG) and semiarid monosp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These revegetation species usually have a higher water demands, resulting in excessive depletion of deep soil water resource, frequent desiccation of soils (Chen, Shao, & Li, 2008; Chen, Wang, Wei, Fu, & Wu, 2010; Wang, Shao, Liu, & Warrington, 2012; 2015 and thus alter the spatial patterns of deep SWC in soil profile (Yang, Chen, & Wei, 2015). In addition, compared with mixed forest, monoculture forest has lower values of water use efficiency (Forrester, Theiveyanathan, Collopy, & Marcar, 2010), infiltration rate and depletion constant (Kopler, Burg, Wittenberg, & Malkinson, 2019), thereby explaining why monoculture forest is less adaptable, particularly in semi‐arid CZs where water is limited. However, the spatial variability and temporal stability of deep SWC under monoculture forest in the CZ of the CLP are poorly understood due to the limitations of available field data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These revegetation species usually have a higher water demands, resulting in excessive depletion of deep soil water resource, frequent desiccation of soils (Chen, Shao, & Li, 2008; Chen, Wang, Wei, Fu, & Wu, 2010; Wang, Shao, Liu, & Warrington, 2012; 2015 and thus alter the spatial patterns of deep SWC in soil profile (Yang, Chen, & Wei, 2015). In addition, compared with mixed forest, monoculture forest has lower values of water use efficiency (Forrester, Theiveyanathan, Collopy, & Marcar, 2010), infiltration rate and depletion constant (Kopler, Burg, Wittenberg, & Malkinson, 2019), thereby explaining why monoculture forest is less adaptable, particularly in semi‐arid CZs where water is limited. However, the spatial variability and temporal stability of deep SWC under monoculture forest in the CZ of the CLP are poorly understood due to the limitations of available field data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the intensity of radiation throughout the day can result in different microsites with similar daily total levels (Smith, Hogan, & Idol, 1992) and potentially affect sapling dynamics. Decreases in water availability (i.e., increases in the number of months with reduced soil water availability) negatively affected sapling growth (Figure 2.2), as in previous studies (Davis et al, 1999;Gemmel, Nilsson, & Welander, 1996;Khurana & Singh, 2004;Kopler, Burg, Wittenberg, & Malkinson, 2018).…”
Section: Effect Of Resource Availability On Sapling Growthsupporting
confidence: 77%