1984
DOI: 10.1139/z84-153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in skeletal characters between the disjunct eastern and western populations of ring-billed gulls (Larus delawarensis)

Abstract: Univariate analyses of variance, multivariate analyses of variance (Manova), and discriminant function analyses were performed on measurements of 51 skeletal characters of adult males and females from the disjunct eastern and western populations of the ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis) in Canada. The analyses established sufficient differences in skeletal characters to permit correct identification of the origin of 34 of 38 males (90%) and 40 of 42 females (95%). The populations are now expanding in range … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used molecular sexing of 72 h old embryos to test whether eggs containing male ring‐ billed gulls Larus delawarensis contain more resources in the form of yolk or albumen than eggs containing female embryos. In ring‐billed gulls, adult males are ca 15% heavier and structurally larger than females (Termaat and Ryder 1984, Ryder 1993), and the larger sex may require more resources during development. Because males are the larger sex in this species, we predicted that eggs containing male embryos would be larger and richer in resources than eggs containing female embryos, to provide male chicks with an advantage at hatching.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used molecular sexing of 72 h old embryos to test whether eggs containing male ring‐ billed gulls Larus delawarensis contain more resources in the form of yolk or albumen than eggs containing female embryos. In ring‐billed gulls, adult males are ca 15% heavier and structurally larger than females (Termaat and Ryder 1984, Ryder 1993), and the larger sex may require more resources during development. Because males are the larger sex in this species, we predicted that eggs containing male embryos would be larger and richer in resources than eggs containing female embryos, to provide male chicks with an advantage at hatching.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%