Differences in Sensorimotor Processing of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimuli

Kamen, Gary; Morris, Harold H.

doi:10.1080/02701367.1988.10605470

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to this hypothesis, haptic cues are encoded directly at the sensorimotor level, whereas visual cues require additional time-consuming cognitive processing. This hypothesis is generally consistent with earlier basic (non-driving) experiments suggesting that kinesthetic and/or vibrotactile information can be used as quickly and accurately as vision to elicit movements, and sometimes even show a clear advantage (e.g., Flanders & Cordo, 1989;Flanders et al, 1986;Gielen et al, 1983;Jordan, 1972;Kamen & Morris, 1988;Klein, 1977;Klein & Posner, 1974;Prewett et al, 2012).…”

Section: Dual Route Hypothesissupporting

confidence: 89%

Planning Lane Changes using Advance Visual and Haptic Information

Frissen

Mars

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taking a motor planning perspective, this study investigates whether haptic force cues displayed on the steering wheel are more effective than visual cues in signaling the direction of an upcoming lane change. Licensed drivers drove in a fixed-base driving simulator equipped with an active steering system for realistic force-feedback. They were instructed to make lane changes upon registering a directional cue. Cues were delivered according to the movement precuing technique employing a pair of precues and imperative cues which could be either visual, haptic, or crossmodal (a visual precue with a haptic imperative cue, and vice versa). The main dependent variable was response times. Additional analyses were conducted on steering wheel angle profiles and error rates. Conditions with a haptic imperative cue produced considerably faster responses than conditions with a visual imperative cue, irrespective of the precue modality. Valid and invalid precues produced the typical gains and costs, with one exception. There appeared to be little cost in response time or steering errors associated with invalid cueing when both cues were haptic. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that imperative haptic cues facilitate action selection while visual stimuli require additional time-consuming cognitive processing.

show abstract

Section: Dual Route Hypothesissupporting

confidence: 89%

Planning Lane Changes using Advance Visual and Haptic Information

Frissen

Mars

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to this hypothesis, haptic cues are encoded directly at the sensorimotor level, whereas visual cues require additional time-consuming cognitive processing. This hypothesis is generally consistent with earlier basic (non-driving) experiments suggesting that kinesthetic and/or vibrotactile information can be used as quickly and accurately as vision to elicit movements, and sometimes even show a clear advantage (e.g., Bell & Macuga, 2019;Crevecoeur et al, 2016;Flanders & Cordo, 1989;Flanders et al, 1986;Gielen et al, 1983;Jordan, 1972;Kamen & Morris, 1988;Klein, 1977;Klein & Posner, 1974;Ng & Chan, 2012;Prewett et al, 2012).…”

Section: Dual Route Hypothesissupporting

confidence: 88%

Planning lane changes using advance visual and haptic information

Frissen,

Mars

2023

Psychological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taking a motor planning perspective, this study investigates whether haptic force cues displayed on the steering wheel are more effective than visual cues in signaling the direction of an upcoming lane change. Licensed drivers drove in a fixed-base driving simulator equipped with an active steering system for realistic force-feedback. They were instructed to make lane changes upon registering a directional cue. Cues were delivered according to the movement precuing technique employing a pair of precues and imperative cues which could be either visual, haptic, or crossmodal (a visual precue with a haptic imperative cue, and vice versa). The main dependent variable was response time. Additional analyses were conducted on steering wheel angle profiles and the rate of initial steering errors. Conditions with a haptic imperative cue produced considerably faster responses than conditions with a visual imperative cue, irrespective of the precue modality. Valid and invalid precues produced the typical gains and costs, with one exception. There appeared to be little cost in response time or initial steering errors associated with invalid cueing when both cues were haptic. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that imperative haptic cues facilitate action selection while visual stimuli require additional time-consuming cognitive processing.

show abstract

Differences in Sensorimotor Processing of Visual and Proprioceptive Stimuli

Cited by 2 publications

References 17 publications

Planning Lane Changes using Advance Visual and Haptic Information

Planning Lane Changes using Advance Visual and Haptic Information

Planning lane changes using advance visual and haptic information

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About