Abstract:Objectives
To compare differences in self-rated oral health among community-dwelling Black, Hispanic, and White adults aged 60 and older.
Method
A total of 4,859 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2004) provided self-report information on oral health.
Results
Blacks and Hispanics reported poorer self-rated oral health than Whites. In separate dentate and edentulous groups, socioeconomic status, social support, physical health, clinical oral health outcomes, and denta… Show more
“…Similar finding has been reported in a recent study conducted in Somali adults (Okunseri et al, 2008a). Associations between SROH and socio-economic position markers (e.g., education, occupation, household income, household wealth, subjective social status and childhood socio-economic position) have been reported in several studies (Borrell&Baquero, 2011;Finlayson et al, 2010;Locker, 2009;Pattussi et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2011). In contrast, in the present study, SES (measured by the VERI Socio-Economic Status Index) is not associated with SROH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Associations between self-perceptions of general health status and SROH have been reported in several studies (Atchison & Gift, 1997;Benyamini et al, 2004;Okunseri et al, 2008a, b). Psychosocial factors (e.g., self-esteem, mastery, personal control, life satisfaction, stress, sense of cohesion, depression, resilience, social support) were found to be related to SROH (Benyamini et al,2004;Finlayson et al, 2010;Locker, 2009;Martins et al,2011;Peker & Bermek, 2011;Sanders & Spencer, 2005;Wu et al, 2011). SROH was also associated significantly with oral functional problems and concerns (Ekbäck et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 1998;Kim et al, 2010;Locker et al, 2009;Ugarte et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies showed that individuals who perceive better oral health had a higher frequency of seeking preventive dental care (Araújo et al, 2009;Camargo et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2003;Matos&Lima-Costa, 2006;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Pavi et al, 2010;Thomson et al, 2010;Woolfolk et al 1999;Wu et al, 2011). In addition, poor SROH was associated significantly with unfavorable oral health behaviors (Ekbäck et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010;Locker et al, 2009;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Wu et al, 2011). Associations between self-perceptions of general health status and SROH have been reported in several studies (Atchison & Gift, 1997;Benyamini et al, 2004;Okunseri et al, 2008a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of independent individual-level variables were identified that may influence SROH: (1) exogenous variables (age, gender); (2) personal characteristics of primary determinants of oral health (predisposing socio-demographic and health beliefs factors -education, marital status, oral health locus of control (LOC) beliefs, perceived general health status; enabling characteristics -socio-economic status, having dental insurance; need factors -perceived dental treatment need, self-reported number of teeth, self-reported dental pain and dental problems, and (3) oral health behaviors (frequency of tooth brushing, dental attendance pattern, use of dental floss). A number of studies showed that demographic and socio-economic variables such as gender, age, income and marital status have been associated with SROH (Borrell & Baquero, 2011;Finlayson et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2010;Okunseri et al, 2008a;Patussi et al, 2010;Ugarte et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2011). Previous studies showed that individuals who perceive better oral health had a higher frequency of seeking preventive dental care (Araújo et al, 2009;Camargo et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2003;Matos&Lima-Costa, 2006;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Pavi et al, 2010;Thomson et al, 2010;Woolfolk et al 1999;Wu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies showed that demographic and socio-economic variables such as gender, age, income and marital status have been associated with SROH (Borrell & Baquero, 2011;Finlayson et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2010;Okunseri et al, 2008a;Patussi et al, 2010;Ugarte et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2011). Previous studies showed that individuals who perceive better oral health had a higher frequency of seeking preventive dental care (Araújo et al, 2009;Camargo et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2003;Matos&Lima-Costa, 2006;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Pavi et al, 2010;Thomson et al, 2010;Woolfolk et al 1999;Wu et al, 2011). In addition, poor SROH was associated significantly with unfavorable oral health behaviors (Ekbäck et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010;Locker et al, 2009;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Wu et al, 2011).…”
“…Similar finding has been reported in a recent study conducted in Somali adults (Okunseri et al, 2008a). Associations between SROH and socio-economic position markers (e.g., education, occupation, household income, household wealth, subjective social status and childhood socio-economic position) have been reported in several studies (Borrell&Baquero, 2011;Finlayson et al, 2010;Locker, 2009;Pattussi et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2011). In contrast, in the present study, SES (measured by the VERI Socio-Economic Status Index) is not associated with SROH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Associations between self-perceptions of general health status and SROH have been reported in several studies (Atchison & Gift, 1997;Benyamini et al, 2004;Okunseri et al, 2008a, b). Psychosocial factors (e.g., self-esteem, mastery, personal control, life satisfaction, stress, sense of cohesion, depression, resilience, social support) were found to be related to SROH (Benyamini et al,2004;Finlayson et al, 2010;Locker, 2009;Martins et al,2011;Peker & Bermek, 2011;Sanders & Spencer, 2005;Wu et al, 2011). SROH was also associated significantly with oral functional problems and concerns (Ekbäck et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 1998;Kim et al, 2010;Locker et al, 2009;Ugarte et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies showed that individuals who perceive better oral health had a higher frequency of seeking preventive dental care (Araújo et al, 2009;Camargo et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2003;Matos&Lima-Costa, 2006;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Pavi et al, 2010;Thomson et al, 2010;Woolfolk et al 1999;Wu et al, 2011). In addition, poor SROH was associated significantly with unfavorable oral health behaviors (Ekbäck et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010;Locker et al, 2009;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Wu et al, 2011). Associations between self-perceptions of general health status and SROH have been reported in several studies (Atchison & Gift, 1997;Benyamini et al, 2004;Okunseri et al, 2008a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of independent individual-level variables were identified that may influence SROH: (1) exogenous variables (age, gender); (2) personal characteristics of primary determinants of oral health (predisposing socio-demographic and health beliefs factors -education, marital status, oral health locus of control (LOC) beliefs, perceived general health status; enabling characteristics -socio-economic status, having dental insurance; need factors -perceived dental treatment need, self-reported number of teeth, self-reported dental pain and dental problems, and (3) oral health behaviors (frequency of tooth brushing, dental attendance pattern, use of dental floss). A number of studies showed that demographic and socio-economic variables such as gender, age, income and marital status have been associated with SROH (Borrell & Baquero, 2011;Finlayson et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2010;Okunseri et al, 2008a;Patussi et al, 2010;Ugarte et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2011). Previous studies showed that individuals who perceive better oral health had a higher frequency of seeking preventive dental care (Araújo et al, 2009;Camargo et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2003;Matos&Lima-Costa, 2006;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Pavi et al, 2010;Thomson et al, 2010;Woolfolk et al 1999;Wu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies showed that demographic and socio-economic variables such as gender, age, income and marital status have been associated with SROH (Borrell & Baquero, 2011;Finlayson et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2010;Okunseri et al, 2008a;Patussi et al, 2010;Ugarte et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2011). Previous studies showed that individuals who perceive better oral health had a higher frequency of seeking preventive dental care (Araújo et al, 2009;Camargo et al, 2009;Gilbert et al, 2003;Matos&Lima-Costa, 2006;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Pavi et al, 2010;Thomson et al, 2010;Woolfolk et al 1999;Wu et al, 2011). In addition, poor SROH was associated significantly with unfavorable oral health behaviors (Ekbäck et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010;Locker et al, 2009;Okunseri et al, 2008b;Wu et al, 2011).…”
When investigating health disparities, it can be of interest to explore whether adjustment for socioeconomic factors at the neighborhood level can account for, or even reverse, an unadjusted difference. Recently, we proposed new methods to adjust the effect of an individual-level covariate for confounding by unmeasured neighborhood-level covariates using complex survey data and a generalization of conditional likelihood methods. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) are a popular alternative to conditional likelihood methods in many circumstances. Therefore, in the present article, we propose and investigate a new adaptation of GLMMs for complex survey data that achieves the same goal of adjusting for confounding by unmeasured neighborhood-level covariates. With the new GLMM approach, one must correctly model the expectation of the unmeasured neighborhood-level effect as a function of the individual-level covariates. We demonstrate using simulations that even if that model is correct, census data on the individual-level covariates are sometimes required for consistent estimation of the effect of the individual-level covariate. We apply the new methods to investigate disparities in recency of dental cleaning, treated as an ordinal outcome, using data from the 2008 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. We operationalize neighborhood as zip code and merge the BRFSS data with census data on ZIP Code Tabulated Areas to incorporate census data on the individual-level covariates. We compare the new results to our previous analysis, which used conditional likelihood methods. We find that the results are qualitatively similar.
Objectives:
Guided by the models of health assessment and social determinants of health, we examined predictors of self-rated physical, mental, oral, and cognitive health of older Korean immigrants.
Methods:
Data came from the Study of Older Korean Americans (SOKA;
N
= 2,061, Mean age = 73.2). Multivariate regression models of self-ratings of health were tested with health indicators (both domain-specific and other health indicators including chronic disease, functional disability, problems with teeth or gums, and cognitive function) and sociocultural factors (acculturation, social network, and ethnic community social cohesion).
Results:
For self-rated physical, mental, and oral health, indicators specific to the targeted domain played a primary role, with those of other health domains playing a secondary role. Acculturation and social network were significant predictors of all four measures.
Discussion:
Findings highlight the importance of holistic health assessment that considers a wide range of health domains as well as sociocultural contexts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.