2014
DOI: 10.1089/thy.2012.0635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Risk of Malignancy and Management Recommendations in Subcategories of Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance or Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance: The Role of Ultrasound-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy

Abstract: US-guided CNB demonstrated that Group AUS showed a higher risk of malignancy, of becoming surgical candidates, of having malignant US findings, and of having malignant CNB readings than Group FLUS. Further management guidelines for Group AUS should differ from Group FLUS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
144
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
144
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A particularly controversial problem is the degree of nuclear atypia (polymorphism) that allows the categorisation of aspirate as FLUS and not SM. Some authors even distinguish the separate category for smears with abnormalities in cellular nuclei, such as the presence of occasional nuclear grooves, an abnormal chromatin pattern, or nuclear overlapping and crowding [7][8][9][10][11]22].…”
Section: Prace Oryginalnementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A particularly controversial problem is the degree of nuclear atypia (polymorphism) that allows the categorisation of aspirate as FLUS and not SM. Some authors even distinguish the separate category for smears with abnormalities in cellular nuclei, such as the presence of occasional nuclear grooves, an abnormal chromatin pattern, or nuclear overlapping and crowding [7][8][9][10][11]22].…”
Section: Prace Oryginalnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings concern the presence of a papillary thyroid carcinoma. Choi et al (2014) named that subgroup -"AUS -atypia with undetermined significance"; Ho et al applied the term "AUS/FLUS -cannot rule out PTC" [11,23]. Rosario defined AUS as cytology demonstrating nuclear atypia, but not diagnostic of suspicious for malignancy or malignant tumour [12].…”
Section: Prace Oryginalnementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the meta-analysis by Bongiovanni et al (2012), the overall value of malignancy was reported to be 16% according to diagnostic criteria III and 26% according to diagnostic criteria IV, but cytological-histological correlation was available for only about 70% of nodules. In studies in which cytological-histological correlation has been available in BSRTC category III lesions, the risk of malignancy has been seen to fluctuate widely, from 19% to 77% (Dincer et al, 2013;Choi et al, 2014;Cuhaci et al, 2014;Ho et al, 2014;Hyeon et al, 2014;Rosario, 2014;Yoon et al, 2014;Deniwar et al, 2015;Kapila et al, 2015;Yoo et al, 2015). Also, there was a significant increase in the malignancy rate from sub-category FLUS to sub-category AUS in some (Choi et al, 2014), but not all (Cuhaci et al, 2014), investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies in which cytological-histological correlation has been available in BSRTC category III lesions, the risk of malignancy has been seen to fluctuate widely, from 19% to 77% (Dincer et al, 2013;Choi et al, 2014;Cuhaci et al, 2014;Ho et al, 2014;Hyeon et al, 2014;Rosario, 2014;Yoon et al, 2014;Deniwar et al, 2015;Kapila et al, 2015;Yoo et al, 2015). Also, there was a significant increase in the malignancy rate from sub-category FLUS to sub-category AUS in some (Choi et al, 2014), but not all (Cuhaci et al, 2014), investigations. By contrast, in BSRTC category IV, the risk of malignancy (27%-34%) reported in the most recent literature Nikiforov et al, 2014;Deniwar et al, 2015;Kapila et al, 2015) seems to be closer to that previously observed (Cibas and Ali, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%