Differences in representations of Japanese name authority data among CJK countries and the Library of Congress

Kimura, Maiko

doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.03.006

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such cases could be accommodated by adding a region code to the script code, as implemented in the DCAM. In addition, several patterns may be implemented by a given Romanization scheme, such as in Japanese Hepburn Romanization (Kimura, 2014). This complication is best resolved by unifying the Romanization schemes.…”

Section: Wade-gilesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, although the McCune-Reischauer system is used in the ALA/LC Romanization Table for Korean, a system proposed by the South Korean Ministry of Culture and Tourism in 2000 has been adopted as the official Romanization system in South Korea (Kim, 2006). In another example, although both Japanese libraries and the ALA/LC Romanization Table for Japanese apply the Hepburn Romanization system, there are differences in specific Romanization rules among them (Kimura, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A modification of the FRAD model for personal names in non-Roman languages

Kimura

2015

Journal of Documentation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Article information:To cite this document: Maiko Kimura , (2015),"A modification of the FRAD model for personal names in non-Roman languages", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 71 Iss 5 pp. 938 -956 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.(2015),"Toward a universal, meta-theoretical framework for music information classification and retrieval", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 71 Iss 5 pp. 917-937 http://dx.Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emeraldsrm:305060 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. Abstract Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to propose a modification of the Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) model to accommodate names in non-Roman languages with diverse writing systems. Design/methodology/approach -The model modifies and clarifies the attributes and relationships regarding non-Roman languages of the current FRAD model, based on the definitions of transliteration, transcription, and Romanization in ISO 5127:2001. The modified model overcomes the problems inherent in the current FRAD model when handling writing systems in non-Roman languages.Findings -The proposed model clearly shows the hierarchy of Controlled Access Points (CAPs). CAPs are either based directly on names or derived from other CAPs. For name or person identification, a CAP and its derivations should be treated as a set. The proposed model also resolves ambiguity in the definition of the word transliteration in the current FRAD model. Originality/value -By establishing new relationships and amending the attributes of the FRAD model, the proposed model better expresses personal names in non-Roman languages as well as names in western languages. It also organizes complex writing systems of non-Roman languages. The proposed model could lead to an improved format for authority data and will facilitate international sharing of data.

show abstract

Section: Wade-gilesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%