1989
DOI: 10.1159/000185409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Renal Tubular Toxicity of High- and Low-Osmolality Contrast Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms behind the development of CIN are complex. They include potential interplay of vasoconstriction, oxidative stress, and direct tubular toxicity leading to hypoxia of the outer medulla [ 15 - 21 ]. Studies have shown that the contrast administration not only results in vasoconstriction, but toxicity results in proximal tubularvacuolar transformation, interstitial edema and tubular degeneration [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms behind the development of CIN are complex. They include potential interplay of vasoconstriction, oxidative stress, and direct tubular toxicity leading to hypoxia of the outer medulla [ 15 - 21 ]. Studies have shown that the contrast administration not only results in vasoconstriction, but toxicity results in proximal tubularvacuolar transformation, interstitial edema and tubular degeneration [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the development of CIN is a result of the interplay of vasoconstriction, oxidative stress, and direct tubular toxicity leading to hypoxia of the outer medulla 13,1415. Numerous studies have reported on the effects of contrast media on various urinary enzymes and markers of glomerular and tubular function 1620. The complex pathophysiology behind the renal effects of intravenous contrast provides the opportunity to identify multiple markers of potential renal injury 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical studies on nephrotoxicity due to CM are sometimes conflicting (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25) and it is often difficult to compare their results. Furthermore, many of the studies addressed to compare the nephrotoxicity of cardiac angiography with high-osmolar versus low-osmolar CM have some methodological limitations (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%