2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs9030222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences in Rate and Direction of Shifts between Phytoplankton Size Structure and Sea Surface Temperature

Abstract: Species distributions are changing with various rates and directions in response to recent global warming. The velocity of sea surface temperature (SST) has been used to predict species migration and persistence as an expectation of how species track their thermal niches; however, several studies have found that evidence for species shifts has deviated from the velocity of SST. This study investigated whether estimation of the velocity of shifts in phytoplankton size structure using remote sensing data could c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These spatial patterns of the CSD slope exhibited an inverse relationship with Chl a , suggesting that areas of the relative dominance of larger‐ and smaller‐sized phytoplankton support high and low productivity, respectively. Although the original version of the CSD model (Waga et al, ) contained large uncertainties for oligotrophic regions, the reconstructed CSD model demonstrated its reliable performance for global monitoring of phytoplankton size structure, because larger and smaller CSD slopes indicating larger proportions of small‐ and large‐sized phytoplankton were found in oligotrophic and eutrophic regions, respectively. Note that the in situ measured Chl a values ranged from 0.04 to 17.04 and 0.07 to 6.80 mg m −3 for reconstruction and match‐up data set, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These spatial patterns of the CSD slope exhibited an inverse relationship with Chl a , suggesting that areas of the relative dominance of larger‐ and smaller‐sized phytoplankton support high and low productivity, respectively. Although the original version of the CSD model (Waga et al, ) contained large uncertainties for oligotrophic regions, the reconstructed CSD model demonstrated its reliable performance for global monitoring of phytoplankton size structure, because larger and smaller CSD slopes indicating larger proportions of small‐ and large‐sized phytoplankton were found in oligotrophic and eutrophic regions, respectively. Note that the in situ measured Chl a values ranged from 0.04 to 17.04 and 0.07 to 6.80 mg m −3 for reconstruction and match‐up data set, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size structure of phytoplankton communities was detected using a Chl a size distribution (CSD) model (Waga et al, 2017(Waga et al, , 2019 which retrieves the exponent of the CSD (hereafter, the CSD slope) as a proxy of the size structure of phytoplankton communities based on the spectral shape of a ph (λ). A small CSD slope represents a large fraction of larger-sized phytoplankton, whereas a large CSD slope indicates that smaller-sized phytoplankton dominate.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Size Structure Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the coefficients a and b are empirically derived values and R is the base-10 logarithm of the maximum band ratio of R rs (λ) for blue to green wavelengths. In addition, the size structure of phytoplankton communities was detected using a chla size distribution (CSD) model (Waga et al, 2017(Waga et al, , 2019 which retrieves the exponent of the CSD (hereafter, the CSD slope) as an index of the synoptic size structure of phytoplankton communities. A large CSD slope indicates a large proportion of smaller phytoplankton, whereas a small CSD slope suggests that larger phytoplankton dominate.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Biomass and Size Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practically, multiple size class is repetitious and cumbersome for biogeochemical and biological studies. For this reason, several studies tried to represent PSC by using a single index such as PSD slopes [21] or CSD slopes [60]. These methods are possible ways to avoid poor estimation accuracy of nano-plankton.…”
Section: Errors Introduced Via Reconstruction Of Chla Using Alh Methods Instead Of Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%